8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Cancer & Tumors1,292 citations

Kumar S, Behari J, Sisodia R

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2013

Share:

Database error: this multiple myeloma cancer study was incorrectly classified as EMF research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study appears to have incorrect metadata - the abstract describes multiple myeloma cancer treatment outcomes over a 10-year period, not EMF research. The abstract shows improved survival rates for cancer patients, particularly those over 65, with newer drug therapies introduced after 2006.

Why This Matters

This entry highlights a critical issue in EMF research databases: accurate study classification. While the abstract discusses cancer treatment advances, it's been incorrectly tagged as EMF research. This kind of misclassification undermines scientific credibility and makes it harder for people to find legitimate EMF health studies. The reality is that proper research categorization is essential for understanding genuine EMF health effects. When studies are mislabeled, it creates confusion and potentially dilutes the impact of actual EMF research that demonstrates measurable biological effects.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2013). Kumar S, Behari J, Sisodia R.
Show BibTeX
@article{kumar_s_behari_j_sisodia_r_ce2877,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Kumar S, Behari J, Sisodia R},
  year = {2013},
  doi = {10.1038/leu.2013.313},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a database classification error. The abstract describes multiple myeloma cancer treatment outcomes, not electromagnetic field research, suggesting incorrect metadata or study categorization in the EMF research database.
Nothing based on this abstract. Multiple myeloma is a blood cancer, and this study examined survival rates with different drug therapies between 2001-2010, with no mention of electromagnetic field exposure or effects.
While some research has investigated potential links between EMF exposure and various cancers, this particular study focuses solely on treatment outcomes and survival rates, not causation or EMF exposure factors.
Look for abstracts that specifically mention electromagnetic fields, radiofrequency radiation, magnetic fields, or EMF exposure parameters like frequency and power levels. This study contains none of these EMF-related terms or concepts.
Researchers should implement better quality control measures, use standardized keywords for EMF studies, and regularly audit databases to ensure accurate categorization. Proper classification is essential for meaningful scientific analysis and public understanding.