8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

Lacroix A, Proulx-Bégin L, Hamel R, De Beaumont L, Bernier P-M, Lepage J- F

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2019

Share:

This particle physics study was incorrectly included in EMF health research databases.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This appears to be a physics study about particle accelerator experiments searching for supersymmetric particles, not EMF health research. The study analyzed high-energy proton collisions at CERN's Large Hadron Collider to look for evidence of theoretical particles called gluinos and top squarks. No significant findings related to electromagnetic field health effects were reported.

Why This Matters

This study has been incorrectly categorized in our EMF health database. The research involves high-energy particle physics experiments at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, which has no relevance to electromagnetic field health effects on biological systems. While particle accelerators do generate electromagnetic fields, this study focuses entirely on theoretical particle physics rather than any biological or health outcomes. This type of misclassification highlights the importance of careful study screening when building databases of EMF health research, as mixing unrelated physics research with biological studies can confuse the scientific picture and mislead readers seeking information about EMF health effects.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2019). Lacroix A, Proulx-Bégin L, Hamel R, De Beaumont L, Bernier P-M, Lepage J- F.
Show BibTeX
@article{lacroix_a_proulx_bgin_l_hamel_r_de_beaumont_l_bernier_p_m_lepage_j_f_ce4452,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Lacroix A, Proulx-Bégin L, Hamel R, De Beaumont L, Bernier P-M, Lepage J- F},
  year = {2019},
  doi = {10.1016/epjc/s10052-019-6926-x},
  
}
DOI: 10.1016/epjc/s10052-019-6926-x

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a database classification error. The study examines theoretical particle physics at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, not biological effects of electromagnetic fields. It belongs in physics journals, not EMF health research collections.
While particle accelerators generate electromagnetic fields, this study doesn't examine health effects. The research focuses on detecting supersymmetric particles through high-energy proton collisions, with no biological endpoints or health measurements included in the methodology.
Nothing directly. These are theoretical particles from supersymmetry physics models. The study searches for evidence of these particles in collision data, but contains no electromagnetic field exposure measurements or biological health assessments.
No, this represents completely different scientific fields. EMF health research examines biological effects of electromagnetic field exposure, while supersymmetry studies explore theoretical particle physics. The two areas have no meaningful overlap for health research purposes.
Database classification errors can occur when automated systems incorrectly categorize studies based on keywords. This highlights the need for human oversight in curating EMF health research databases to ensure only relevant biological studies are included.