8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Li Y, Yan X, Liu J, Li L, Hu X, Sun H, Tian J

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2014

Share:

This appears to be a physics research funding acknowledgment, not an EMF health study.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This appears to be a funding acknowledgment section from a 2014 physics research paper by Li Y, Yan X, Liu J, Li L, Hu X, Sun H, and Tian J, rather than an EMF health study. The abstract lists dozens of international funding agencies that supported what was likely particle physics research at CERN and other major physics institutions. Without the actual study content, no EMF health effects can be determined.

Why This Matters

This entry appears to be misclassified in the EMF Research Hub database. What we're seeing is actually a standard funding acknowledgment section from a high-energy physics paper, not EMF health research. The extensive list of international funding agencies, including CERN and national particle physics institutions, strongly suggests this was fundamental physics research unrelated to biological EMF effects. This highlights an important issue in EMF research databases - the need for careful categorization to distinguish between studies of electromagnetic phenomena in physics versus biological effects of EMF exposure. When evaluating EMF health research, it's crucial to focus on studies that actually examine biological systems and health outcomes, not fundamental physics research that happens to involve electromagnetic fields in a completely different context.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2014). Li Y, Yan X, Liu J, Li L, Hu X, Sun H, Tian J.
Show BibTeX
@article{li_y_yan_x_liu_j_li_l_hu_x_sun_h_tian_j_ce4462,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Li Y, Yan X, Liu J, Li L, Hu X, Sun H, Tian J},
  year = {2014},
  doi = {10.1103/PHYSREVD.89.092007},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

No, this appears to be a funding acknowledgment section from a 2014 particle physics research paper. The extensive list of international physics institutions and CERN suggests fundamental physics research, not biological EMF health effects studies.
This appears to be a database categorization error. The entry contains only funding acknowledgments from physics institutions, with no actual study abstract, methods, or health-related findings that would qualify it as EMF health research.
The listed agencies primarily fund high-energy particle physics, nuclear physics, and fundamental electromagnetic research at institutions like CERN. This type of physics research studies electromagnetic phenomena but not biological health effects from EMF exposure.
The absence of any biological endpoints, health outcomes, or EMF exposure parameters, combined with funding from particle physics institutions and CERN, clearly indicates this is fundamental physics research rather than EMF health studies.
No, this entry provides no EMF health information since it's only a funding acknowledgment section. It demonstrates the importance of verifying that database entries actually contain relevant EMF health research data before drawing conclusions.