3,138 Studies Reviewed. 77.4% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Quantifying the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a case-control study of mobile phone use.

Bioeffects Seen

Vrijheid M, Richardson L, Armstrong BK, Auvinen A, Berg G, Carroll M, Chetrit A, Deltour I, Feychting M, Giles GG, Hours M, Iavarone I, Lagorio S, Lönn S, McBride M, Parent ME, Sadetzki S, Salminen T, Sanchez M, Schlehofer B, Schüz J, Siemiatycki J, Tynes T, Woodward A, Yamaguchi N, Cardis E. · 2009

View Original Abstract
Share:

Study participation bias may cause mobile phone research to underestimate brain tumor risks by 10%.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study examined a critical flaw in mobile phone brain tumor research: people who refuse to participate in studies are less likely to use mobile phones regularly. Researchers found that non-participants used phones at lower rates (50-56%) compared to study participants (66-69%), creating a systematic bias that could underestimate cancer risks by about 10%. This means many studies may be missing the very people whose phone usage patterns could reveal stronger links to brain tumors.

Why This Matters

This research exposes a fundamental problem plaguing mobile phone safety studies that the wireless industry rarely acknowledges. When people who use phones less frequently are more likely to skip participating in research, the studies systematically undercount heavy users and their potential health effects. The science demonstrates that this selection bias could be masking real risks by approximately 10%. What this means for you is that the reassuring conclusions from many mobile phone studies may be based on incomplete data that favors the appearance of safety. The reality is that methodological flaws like this help explain why regulatory agencies continue to claim mobile phones are safe despite mounting evidence of biological effects.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To quantitatively assess the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a multinational case–control study of mobile phone use and brain tumor.

Non-response questionnaires (NRQ) were completed by a sub-set of nonparticipants. Selection bias fac...

Regular mobile phone use was reported less frequently by controls and cases who completed the NRQ (c...

Refusal to participate in brain tumor case–control studies seems to be related to less prevalent use of mobile phones, and this could result in a downward bias of around 10% in odds ratios for regular mobile phone use. The use of simple selection bias estimation methods in case–control studies can give important insights into the extent of any bias, even when nonparticipant information is incomplete

Cite This Study
Vrijheid M, Richardson L, Armstrong BK, Auvinen A, Berg G, Carroll M, Chetrit A, Deltour I, Feychting M, Giles GG, Hours M, Iavarone I, Lagorio S, Lönn S, McBride M, Parent ME, Sadetzki S, Salminen T, Sanchez M, Schlehofer B, Schüz J, Siemiatycki J, Tynes T, Woodward A, Yamaguchi N, Cardis E. (2009). Quantifying the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a case-control study of mobile phone use. Ann Epidemiol. 19(1):33-41, 2009.
Show BibTeX
@article{m_2009_quantifying_the_impact_of_2669,
  author = {Vrijheid M and Richardson L and Armstrong BK and Auvinen A and Berg G and Carroll M and Chetrit A and Deltour I and Feychting M and Giles GG and Hours M and Iavarone I and Lagorio S and Lönn S and McBride M and Parent ME and Sadetzki S and Salminen T and Sanchez M and Schlehofer B and Schüz J and Siemiatycki J and Tynes T and Woodward A and Yamaguchi N and Cardis E.},
  title = {Quantifying the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a case-control study of mobile phone use.},
  year = {2009},
  
  url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1047279708003177},
}

Quick Questions About This Study

This study examined a critical flaw in mobile phone brain tumor research: people who refuse to participate in studies are less likely to use mobile phones regularly. Researchers found that non-participants used phones at lower rates (50-56%) compared to study participants (66-69%), creating a systematic bias that could underestimate cancer risks by about 10%. This means many studies may be missing the very people whose phone usage patterns could reveal stronger links to brain tumors.