Influence of non ionizing radiation of base stations on the activity of redox proteins in bovines.
Hässig M, Wullschleger M, Naegeli HP, Kupper J, Spiess B, Kuster N, Capstick M, Murbach M. · 2014
View Original AbstractNon-ionizing radiation from base stations changed enzyme activities in cows, disabling some enzymes and enabling others, while individual cows reacted differently.
Plain English Summary
The study aimed to observe the influence of non-ionizing radiation from base stations on redox protein activity in bovines. The experiment found that NIR changed enzyme activities, with certain enzymes disabled and others enabled. Individual cows showed varied reactions, with some reacting to NIR, others not reacting, or reacting inversely. The study approach of testing ten cows each ten times during three phases was deemed appropriate. The authors noted that future studies should set the post-exposure phase later.
Why This Matters
The researchers observed individual behavior patterns among the cows. The results aligned with existing literature indicating that NIR leads to changes in redox proteins and that some individuals are radiation-sensitive while others are not. However, sensitivity could not be distinctly attributed because cows that reacted clearly with one enzyme might not react with another enzyme or react inversely.
Study Details
The aim of this study is to observe Influence of non ionizing radiation of base stations on the activity of redox proteins in bovines
In this experiment, the NIR has resulted in changes in the enzyme activities. Certain enzymes were d...
The present results coincide with the information from the literature, according to which NIR leads to changes in redox proteins, and that there are individuals who are sensitive to radiation and others that are not. However, the latter could not be distinctly attributed – there are cows that react clearly with one enzyme while they do not react with another enzyme at all, or even the inverse. The study approach of testing ten cows each ten times during three phases has proven to be appropriate. Future studies should however set the post-exposure phase later on.
Show BibTeX
@article{m_2014_influence_of_non_ionizing_1645,
author = {Hässig M and Wullschleger M and Naegeli HP and Kupper J and Spiess B and Kuster N and Capstick M and Murbach M.},
title = {Influence of non ionizing radiation of base stations on the activity of redox proteins in bovines.},
year = {2014},
doi = {10.1186/1746-6148-10-136},
url = {https://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1746-6148-10-136},
}Cited By (13 papers)
- Electrosmog and species conservation.Influential
A. Balmori (2014) - 38 citations
- Role of energy storage systems in energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables
A. Kalair et al. (2020) - 669 citations
- Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation.
A. Balmori (2015) - 75 citations
- Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 2 impacts: how species interact with natural and man-made EMF
B. Levitt et al. (2021) - 48 citations
- Radiotelemetry and wildlife: Highlighting a gap in the knowledge on radiofrequency radiation effects.
A. Balmori (2016) - 27 citations
- Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields above 100 MHz on Fauna and Flora: Workshop Report
B. Pophof et al. (2022) - 18 citations
- Signal level performance variation of radio frequency identification tags used in cow body
Habib Doğan et al. (2019) - 9 citations
- Alternative Device for Non-Ionizing Radiation Detection
A. Kayode et al. (2019) - 5 citations
- The removal of methylene blue by modified alumina using sodium dodecyl sulphate(SDS) from aqueous solutions
F. Irani, Ayoub Parcheh Baf Jadid (2015) - 3 citations
- EMF Exposure and SAR Analysis in the Cow Tissues
Habib Doğan et al. (2017) - 2 citations