8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Martínez-Botas, M.Á

Bioeffects Seen

Martínez, M.A., A. Úbeda, J. · 2022

Share:

This art history study was incorrectly categorized as EMF research and contains no electromagnetic field data.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This appears to be an art history study about 19th century Spanish portrait painter Federico de Madrazo y Kuntz, not an EMF research study. The abstract discusses Romanticism and portraiture, with no mention of electromagnetic fields, health effects, or biological research.

Why This Matters

This entry appears to be misclassified in the EMF Research Hub database. The abstract describes art historical research on a Spanish Romantic painter from the 1800s, completely unrelated to electromagnetic field studies or health effects. This highlights the importance of careful database curation when building scientific resources. Accurate categorization is essential for researchers and the public to find relevant EMF health studies and make informed decisions about exposure risks.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Martínez, M.A., A. Úbeda, J. (2022). Martínez-Botas, M.Á.
Show BibTeX
@article{martnez_botas_m_ce4142,
  author = {Martínez and M.A. and A. Úbeda and J.},
  title = {Martínez-Botas, M.Á},
  year = {2022},
  doi = {10.24310/bolarte.1991.vi12.15053},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a database classification error. The study examines 19th century Spanish portrait painting, not electromagnetic fields or health effects.
No, this study focuses on a Spanish Romantic painter from the 1800s and has no connection to electromagnetic field research or health studies.
None. The abstract discusses portrait painting techniques and artistic movements, with no mention of electromagnetic fields, radiation, or biological effects.
No, art historical research on Romantic period painters provides no relevant data for understanding electromagnetic field health effects or exposure risks.
Absolutely not. This art history research contains no electromagnetic field data and should not factor into any EMF health or safety considerations.