8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHZ) POWER SOURCES

Bioeffects Seen

D. L. Conover, W. H. Parr, E. L. Sensintaffar, W. E. Murray Jr. · 1975

Share:

Industrial RF sources exceeded safety guidelines 80% of the time, revealing widespread occupational overexposure that required specialized near-field measurement techniques.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1975 NIOSH study measured radiofrequency radiation from industrial sources operating between 15-40.68 MHz and found that 80% exceeded safety guidelines for both electric and magnetic field strength. The research revealed that workers near these RF sources faced exposures above the recommended limits of 200 V/m for electric fields and 0.5 A/m for magnetic fields.

Why This Matters

This foundational NIOSH study from 1975 reveals a troubling reality that persists today: industrial RF sources routinely exceed safety guidelines, with 80% of measured sources surpassing recommended exposure limits. What makes this particularly significant is the focus on near-field measurements, which capture the true exposure workers face when operating close to RF equipment. The study's emphasis on measuring both electric and magnetic field components separately was ahead of its time, recognizing that magnetic field exposure dominates in near-field conditions and can't be accurately assessed using standard power density meters.

The frequencies studied (15-40.68 MHz) encompass shortwave radio, amateur radio, and industrial heating applications that remain common today. While these aren't the same frequencies as modern cell phones or WiFi, the fundamental physics of near-field exposure applies across the spectrum. The 80% exceedance rate the researchers documented suggests that occupational RF exposure has been a persistent problem for decades, long before our current concerns about wireless devices.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
D. L. Conover, W. H. Parr, E. L. Sensintaffar, W. E. Murray Jr. (1975). MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHZ) POWER SOURCES.
Show BibTeX
@article{measurement_of_electric_and_magnetic_field_strengths_from_industrial_radiofreque_g4060,
  author = {D. L. Conover and W. H. Parr and E. L. Sensintaffar and W. E. Murray Jr.},
  title = {MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHZ) POWER SOURCES},
  year = {1975},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The NIOSH study found that 80% of industrial radiofrequency sources emitted electric and magnetic field strengths that exceeded the safety guidelines specified in the 1974 ANSI personnel exposure standard for RF radiation.
Standard commercial RF power density monitors use dipole antennas designed for far-field measurements. In near-field conditions at 15-40 MHz frequencies, magnetic field-induced power absorption predominates, which these standard meters cannot accurately detect or measure.
The 1974 ANSI C95.1 Personnel Exposure Standard specified maximum field strengths of 200 V/m for electric fields and 0.5 A/m for magnetic fields as safety guidelines for worker exposure to radiofrequency radiation.
The study measured radiofrequency sources operating between 15 to 40.68 MHz, which includes shortwave radio, amateur radio bands, and industrial heating applications that were common in manufacturing facilities during the 1970s.
NIOSH needed specialized near-field monitors because workers operating RF equipment receive exposures within fractions of a wavelength from the source, where standard measurement techniques provide inaccurate readings and underestimate actual exposure levels.