8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHz) POWER SOURCES

Bioeffects Seen

D. L. Conover, W. H. Parr, E. L. Sensintaffar, W. E. Murray, Jr. · 1976

Share:

80% of industrial RF sources in this NIOSH study exceeded worker safety guidelines, revealing widespread occupational overexposure problems.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1976 NIOSH study measured radiofrequency radiation from 51 industrial RF power sources operating between 15-40.68 MHz. Researchers found that at least 80% of these sources exceeded the safety guidelines for both electric and magnetic field exposure that were established to protect workers. The study highlighted major problems with existing measurement techniques that ignored magnetic field effects in close-range exposures.

Why This Matters

This groundbreaking NIOSH research exposed a critical blind spot in industrial RF safety that remains relevant today. The finding that 80% of surveyed sources exceeded safety guidelines reveals how widespread occupational overexposure was in industrial settings. What makes this study particularly significant is its focus on near-field measurements, which capture both electric and magnetic field components. The researchers discovered that standard monitoring equipment of the time was fundamentally flawed for close-range exposures, missing the magnetic field effects that dominate when workers are near RF sources.

The 15-40.68 MHz frequency range studied here encompasses industrial heating, medical diathermy, and communication applications still in use today. This research demonstrated that proper EMF assessment requires sophisticated measurement techniques that account for the complex electromagnetic environment workers actually experience, not simplified far-field approximations that underestimate real exposure levels.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
D. L. Conover, W. H. Parr, E. L. Sensintaffar, W. E. Murray, Jr. (1976). MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHz) POWER SOURCES.
Show BibTeX
@article{measurement_of_electric_and_magnetic_field_strengths_from_industrial_radiofreque_g4559,
  author = {D. L. Conover and W. H. Parr and E. L. Sensintaffar and W. E. Murray and Jr.},
  title = {MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHz) POWER SOURCES},
  year = {1976},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

At least 80% of the 51 industrial radiofrequency power sources surveyed exceeded the ANSI C95.1-1974 safety guidelines for both electric field strength (200 V/m) and magnetic field strength (0.5 A/m) exposure limits.
Commercial far-field power density monitors with dipole antennas neglected magnetic-field-induced power absorption, which predominates in near-field conditions. This led to significant underestimation of actual worker exposure levels at these frequencies.
Workers operating these RF power sources receive near-field exposures within fractions of a wavelength from the source, where magnetic field effects dominate and standard measurement techniques fail to capture true exposure levels.
NIOSH commissioned the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to construct and calibrate specialized radiofrequency electric and magnetic field-strength monitors specifically designed for accurate near-field exposure measurements in industrial settings.
The study identified the absence of any federal personnel exposure standard specifying proper field-strength measurements for RF sources in the 10-300 MHz range, leading to incorrect monitoring techniques and instrumentation applications.