8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHZ) POWER SOURCES

Bioeffects Seen

D. L. Conover, W. H. Parr, E. L. Sensintaffar, W. E. Murray Jr. · 1975

Share:

80% of industrial RF sources exceeded safety limits, but standard monitoring equipment couldn't even detect the real exposures workers faced.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

NIOSH researchers tested RF monitoring equipment in industrial settings and found that at least 80% of radiofrequency sources exceeded safety guidelines for electric and magnetic field exposure. The study revealed that workers near RF equipment face potentially unsafe exposures that standard monitoring equipment fails to detect properly.

Why This Matters

This 1975 NIOSH study exposed a critical gap in workplace RF safety that persists today. The finding that 80% of industrial RF sources exceeded safety guidelines should have been a wake-up call, yet similar monitoring deficiencies continue across industries using RF equipment. What makes this particularly concerning is that workers received near-field exposures, which create different biological effects than the far-field measurements most safety standards assume. The researchers identified that standard power density monitors completely miss magnetic-field-induced absorption, the dominant exposure mechanism when you're close to RF sources. This means countless workers have been inadequately protected for decades, receiving exposures that existing monitoring simply cannot accurately measure.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
D. L. Conover, W. H. Parr, E. L. Sensintaffar, W. E. Murray Jr. (1975). MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHZ) POWER SOURCES.
Show BibTeX
@article{measurement_of_electric_and_magnetic_field_strengths_from_industrial_radiofreque_g4677,
  author = {D. L. Conover and W. H. Parr and E. L. Sensintaffar and W. E. Murray Jr.},
  title = {MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHZ) POWER SOURCES},
  year = {1975},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

At least 80% of radiofrequency sources in the preliminary industrial survey emitted electric and magnetic field strengths that exceeded the safety guidelines specified in the 1974 ANSI personnel exposure standard.
Commercial far-field power density monitors with dipole antennas neglect magnetic-field-induced power absorption, which predominates when workers are within fractions of a wavelength from RF sources in near-field conditions.
The ANSI C95.1-1974 standard specified field-strength guides of 200 volts per meter for electric fields and 0.5 amperes per meter for magnetic fields as personnel exposure limits.
The study focused on radiofrequency sources operating between 15 to 40.68 MHz, though researchers noted the need for monitoring across the broader 10-300 MHz industrial frequency range.
NIOSH needed specialized near-field monitors because existing commercial equipment couldn't accurately measure worker exposures close to RF sources, where magnetic field effects dominate over electric field measurements.