8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHz) POWER SOURCES

Bioeffects Seen

D. L. Conover, W. H. Parr, E. L. Sensintaffar, W. E. Murray, Jr.

Share:

80% of industrial radiofrequency sources exceeded safety guidelines, but standard monitoring equipment couldn't detect the actual worker exposures.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

NIOSH researchers measured radiofrequency radiation from industrial sources operating at 15-40.68 MHz and found that at least 80% exceeded safety guidelines for both electric and magnetic field strength. The study revealed that standard monitoring equipment designed for far-field measurements was inadequate for assessing near-field exposures that workers actually experience.

Why This Matters

This study exposes a critical gap in workplace EMF protection that persists today. When 80% of industrial RF sources exceed safety guidelines, we're looking at widespread occupational overexposure in the 15-40 MHz range. What's particularly concerning is that standard monitoring equipment was giving false reassurance by underestimating actual exposure levels. The researchers found that near-field conditions create magnetic-field-induced power absorption that conventional meters simply miss. This means countless workers have been unknowingly exposed to EMF levels above established safety thresholds, with no reliable way to measure their true exposure. The study's call for proper field-strength measurements rather than inadequate power density readings remains relevant as industrial RF applications continue expanding.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
D. L. Conover, W. H. Parr, E. L. Sensintaffar, W. E. Murray, Jr. (n.d.). MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHz) POWER SOURCES.
Show BibTeX
@article{measurement_of_electric_and_magnetic_field_strengths_from_industrial_radiofreque_g6123,
  author = {D. L. Conover and W. H. Parr and E. L. Sensintaffar and W. E. Murray and Jr.},
  title = {MEASUREMENT OF ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTHS FROM INDUSTRIAL RADIOFREQUENCY (15-40.68 MHz) POWER SOURCES},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

At least 80% of the industrial radiofrequency sources measured in this study emitted electric and magnetic field strengths that exceeded the safety guidelines specified in the ANSI C95.1-1974 standard (200 V/m electric, 0.5 A/m magnetic).
Standard commercial monitors use dipole antennas designed for far-field measurements, but workers near 15-40 MHz sources experience near-field conditions where magnetic-field-induced power absorption predominates. These standard meters miss this critical exposure component entirely.
Near-field measurements must be made within fractions of a wavelength from the source, where both electric and magnetic field components vary independently. Standard power density meters only work accurately in the far-field zone where these components are predictably related.
The study focused on industrial radiofrequency sources operating in the 15 to 40.68 MHz range. This frequency band is commonly used for industrial heating, welding, and other high-power applications where workers can be exposed at close distances.
The researchers used the ANSI C95.1-1974 Personnel Exposure Standard, which specified maximum field strengths of 200 V/m for electric fields and 0.5 A/m for magnetic fields. The study noted the absence of federal standards requiring field-strength measurements for this frequency range.