Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Investigating short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields on reproductive capacity of invertebrates in the field situation.
Vijver MG, Bolte JF, Evans TR, Tamis WL, Peijnenburg WJ, Musters CJ, de Snoo GR. · 2013
View Original AbstractShort-term mobile tower exposure showed no reproductive effects in invertebrates, but researchers warn this doesn't rule out potential long-term biodiversity impacts.
Plain English Summary
Dutch researchers exposed four species of small invertebrates (insects and other small creatures) to radiofrequency radiation from mobile phone base stations for 48 hours to see if it affected their ability to reproduce. They found no significant impact on fertility or offspring production. However, the researchers emphasized that finding no effects doesn't rule out potential harm, since scientists still don't fully understand how non-thermal EMF exposure might affect living organisms.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 900 MHz Duration: 48 hour
Study Details
In this study we examined the impact of exposure to the fields from mobile phone base stations (GSM 900 MHz) on the reproductive capacity of small, virgin, invertebrates.
A field experiment was performed exposing four different invertebrate species at different distances...
Results showed that distance was not an adequate proxy to explain dose-response regressions. No sign...
Finding no impact on reproductive capacity does not fully exclude the existence of EMF impact, since mechanistically models hypothesizing non-thermal-induced biological effects from RF exposure are still to be developed. The exposure to RF EMF is ubiquitous and is still increasing rapidly over large areas. We plea for more attention toward the possible impacts of EMF on biodiversity.
Show BibTeX
@article{mg_2013_investigating_shortterm_exposure_to_3477,
author = {Vijver MG and Bolte JF and Evans TR and Tamis WL and Peijnenburg WJ and Musters CJ and de Snoo GR.},
title = {Investigating short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields on reproductive capacity of invertebrates in the field situation.},
year = {2013},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23781930/},
}Cited By (25 papers)
- Electromagnetic radiation of mobile telecommunication antennas affects the abundance and composition of wild pollinatorsInfluential
A. Lázaro et al. (2016) - 44 citations
- Changes in honey bee nutrition after exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fieldInfluential
P. Migdał et al. (2024) - 1 citations
- Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation.
A. Balmori (2015) - 75 citations
- Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz
A. Thielens et al. (2018) - 73 citations
- Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 2 impacts: how species interact with natural and man-made EMF
B. Levitt et al. (2021) - 48 citations
- Electromagnetic radiation as an emerging driver factor for the decline of insects.
A. Balmori (2021) - 45 citations
- Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure of Western Honey Bees
A. Thielens et al. (2020) - 43 citations
- Electrosmog and species conservation.
A. Balmori (2014) - 38 citations
- Risk to pollinators from anthropogenic electro-magnetic radiation (EMR): Evidence and knowledge gaps.
A. Vanbergen et al. (2019) - 31 citations
- 3.5-GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation promotes the development of Drosophila melanogaster.
Yahong Wang et al. (2021) - 22 citations