Microwave Hazard Instruments: An Evaluation of the Narda 8100, Holaday HI-1500, and Simpson 380M
W. A. Herman, D. M. Witters, Jr. · 1980
Reliable EMF measurement instruments are essential for protecting workers and the public from microwave radiation exposure.
Plain English Summary
This 1980 technical report evaluated three microwave hazard detection instruments: the Narda 8100, Holaday HI-1500, and Simpson 380M. The study assessed how well these devices measured microwave radiation levels for occupational safety purposes. This research addressed the critical need for accurate EMF measurement tools as microwave technology expanded in industrial and commercial applications.
Why This Matters
This evaluation represents an important milestone in EMF safety infrastructure. By 1980, microwave technology was rapidly expanding beyond military applications into industrial heating, communications, and medical devices. The reality is that accurate measurement tools are fundamental to any meaningful safety program. Without reliable detection instruments, workers and the public remain vulnerable to excessive exposures that may not produce immediate symptoms but could cause long-term health effects. What this means for you today is that the measurement technology we rely on for EMF safety standards has decades of development behind it. However, the proliferation of wireless devices since 1980 has created exposure scenarios these early instruments never anticipated, highlighting the ongoing challenge of keeping measurement capabilities ahead of technology deployment.
Figures from the Original Paper
Diagram extracted from the original research document.
Exposure Information
Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.
Study Details
To evaluate the accuracy of microwave oven survey instruments under various use conditions in the 2450 MHz ISM band
Measurement procedures designed to evaluate the accuracy of instruments under a variety of use condi...
Narda 8100: Absolute calibration showed mean readings 2 percent low compared to BRH calibration. Lin...
The evaluation revealed significant variations in accuracy among the three survey instruments tested. The Narda 8100 showed calibration variations of up to 16.2 percent for the 8121(A) probe and 9.1 percent for the 8122(A) probe. The Holaday HI-1500 showed calibration variations of up to 11.4 percent. The Simpson 380M showed calibration variations of up to 10.0 percent. RFI susceptibility was a significant concern for all three instruments, with 17.2 percent of Narda 8100 units, 10.0 percent of Holaday HI-1500 units, and 15.0 percent of Simpson 380M units showing RFI deflections equaling or exceeding exposure field. Temperature response was generally acceptable but showed variations in sensitivity. Supply voltage response was generally acceptable. Overload performance was generally acceptable. Drift and noise were within acceptable limits. Response time met the 3.0-second specification for later units.
Show BibTeX
@article{microwave_hazard_instruments_an_evaluation_of_the_narda_8100_holaday_hi_1500_and_g7351,
author = {W. A. Herman and D. M. Witters and Jr.},
title = {Microwave Hazard Instruments: An Evaluation of the Narda 8100, Holaday HI-1500, and Simpson 380M},
year = {1980},
}