8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Brain & Nervous System

Mohammed HS et al, (March 2013) Non-thermal continuous and modulated electromagnetic radiation fields effects on sleep EEG of rats, J Adv Res. 2013 Mar;4(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.05.005

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2013

Share:

One month of daily cell phone frequency exposure disrupted rats' REM sleep patterns, suggesting wireless radiation may interfere with critical restorative sleep.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers exposed rats to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation (similar to cell phone frequencies) for one hour daily over a month and measured changes in their sleep brain waves. They found that modulated radiation disrupted REM sleep patterns more than deep sleep, with exposed rats taking longer to enter REM sleep cycles. The study suggests cumulative effects that may alter normal sleep rhythms.

Why This Matters

This study adds to mounting evidence that radiofrequency radiation at cell phone frequencies can disrupt fundamental biological processes, even at non-thermal levels. The 900 MHz frequency used here sits squarely within the range of GSM cell phones and many wireless devices in your home. What makes this particularly concerning is that the effects occurred with just one hour of daily exposure over a month - far less than many people's actual wireless device usage. The disruption of REM sleep is especially troubling because this sleep stage is critical for memory consolidation, emotional regulation, and brain detoxification. The researchers' finding that modulated signals caused more disruption than continuous waves aligns with other research showing that pulsed EMF tends to be more bioactive than steady fields.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 900 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 900 MHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2013). Mohammed HS et al, (March 2013) Non-thermal continuous and modulated electromagnetic radiation fields effects on sleep EEG of rats, J Adv Res. 2013 Mar;4(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.05.005.
Show BibTeX
@article{mohammed_hs_et_al_march_2013_non_thermal_continuous_and_modulated_electromagnetic_radiation_fields_effects_on_sleep_eeg_of_rats_j_adv_res_2013_mar42181_7_doi_101016jjare201205005_ce656,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Mohammed HS et al, (March 2013) Non-thermal continuous and modulated electromagnetic radiation fields effects on sleep EEG of rats, J Adv Res. 2013 Mar;4(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.05.005},
  year = {2013},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jare.2012.05.005},
  
}
DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.05.005PubMed: 25685416

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, this study found that rats exposed to 900 MHz radiation took longer to enter REM sleep and showed altered sleep patterns. The modulated signals at 8 and 16 Hz caused more disruption than continuous waves, suggesting pulsed EMF is more bioactive.
Just one hour of daily 900 MHz exposure for one month was enough to disrupt normal sleep cycles in rats. This is significantly less exposure time than many people get from cell phones and wireless devices throughout the day.
The researchers found REM sleep was more susceptible to radiofrequency radiation than slow wave sleep, though they didn't specify the mechanism. REM sleep involves different brainwave patterns that may be more vulnerable to electromagnetic interference at these frequencies.
Yes, the study showed that 900 MHz waves modulated at 8 and 16 Hz caused greater sleep disruption than unmodulated continuous waves. This supports research indicating that pulsed or modulated EMF tends to be more biologically active.
The researchers proposed that radiation exposure causes cumulative and irreversible effects on sleep patterns. They suggested the extremely low frequency modulation interacts with similar EEG brain frequencies, potentially explaining the persistent sleep disruption observed.