8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Cancer & Tumors

Mortality among a cohort of electric utility workers, 1960-1991

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 1997

Share:

Electric utility field workers showed 2.2-2.4 times higher respiratory cancer rates than office staff over 30 years.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers tracked 40,335 electric utility workers from 1960-1991 to study death rates from occupational exposures. They found field workers (linecrew, power plant staff) had 2.2-2.4 times higher rates of respiratory cancers compared to office workers. The study demonstrates clear occupational health risks for workers with higher EMF exposure levels.

Why This Matters

This large-scale occupational study provides compelling evidence that EMF exposure carries real health risks. The 2.2-fold increase in respiratory cancers among linecrew workers is particularly significant because these employees face the highest electromagnetic field exposures in the utility industry. What makes this finding especially noteworthy is that it emerged despite the 'healthy worker effect' - the tendency for employed populations to show better health outcomes than the general public.

The reality is that electric utility workers experience EMF exposures far exceeding what most of us encounter daily. Yet the consistent pattern of elevated cancer rates among field staff suggests we shouldn't dismiss lower-level exposures as harmless. If occupational EMF exposure increases cancer risk by more than 100%, it raises important questions about the cumulative effects of our increasingly electromagnetic environment.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (1997). Mortality among a cohort of electric utility workers, 1960-1991.
Show BibTeX
@article{mortality_among_a_cohort_of_electric_utility_workers_1960_1991_ce1587,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Mortality among a cohort of electric utility workers, 1960-1991},
  year = {1997},
  doi = {10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199705)31:5<534::AID-AJIM6>3.0.CO;2-T},
  
}
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199705)31:5<534::AID-AJIM6>3.0.CO;2-TPubMed: 9099354

Quick Questions About This Study

Yes, this 30-year study found field workers (linecrew, power plant staff) had 2.2-2.4 times higher respiratory cancer rates compared to office workers. The increased risk was consistent across different types of field occupations with higher EMF exposure.
Researchers analyzed 3,753 deaths among 40,335 electric utility workers employed between 1960-1991. This large sample size over three decades provides robust data on occupational health patterns in the electrical utility industry.
The healthy worker effect means employed people typically have better health than the general population, making occupational health risks appear smaller. This study found EMF-exposed workers had elevated cancer rates despite this protective bias, strengthening the evidence.
Both groups showed similar elevated respiratory cancer risks compared to office staff. Power plant workers had a rate ratio of 2.4, while linecrew workers had 2.2, indicating comparable occupational health risks from EMF exposure.
Yes, nonmanagement field workers had 2.5-4.7 times higher rates of motor vehicle injuries and all injury types compared to office staff. This suggests multiple occupational hazards beyond just EMF exposure affect these workers' health outcomes.