8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Cardiovascular430 citations

Mutat Res 243(2):87-93, 1990.(VT, AE, GT)

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 1990

Share:

This cardiovascular genetics study was incorrectly classified as EMF research, highlighting database accuracy challenges.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study appears to be incorrectly classified in the EMF Research Hub database. The abstract discusses genetic factors in aortic aneurysms and dissections, focusing on hereditary cardiovascular disease rather than electromagnetic field exposure effects. The research examines how genetic variants predispose individuals to thoracic and abdominal aortic diseases.

Why This Matters

This entry highlights a critical issue in EMF research databases - the importance of accurate study classification. While the study itself provides valuable insights into cardiovascular genetics, it has no relevance to electromagnetic field health effects. This type of misclassification can undermine the credibility of EMF research collections and make it harder for researchers, policymakers, and the public to access reliable information about actual EMF health studies. The reality is that EMF research faces enough challenges from industry influence and regulatory capture without adding confusion through database errors. What this means for you is the need to verify study relevance when researching EMF health effects, as even well-intentioned databases can contain classification errors.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (1990). Mutat Res 243(2):87-93, 1990.(VT, AE, GT).
Show BibTeX
@article{mutat_res_243287_93_1990vt_ae_gt_ce2775,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Mutat Res 243(2):87-93, 1990.(VT, AE, GT)},
  year = {1990},
  doi = {10.1161/circresaha.118.312436},
  
}
DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.118.312436PubMed: 30763214

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a database classification error. The study examines genetic factors in cardiovascular disease, not electromagnetic field exposure effects. Such misclassifications can occur in research databases and highlight the importance of verifying study relevance.
No, this study focuses entirely on genetic variants that predispose individuals to aortic aneurysms and dissections. There is no mention of electromagnetic fields, radiation exposure, or any EMF-related health effects in the research.
The study examines the genetic basis of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm diseases, focusing on how inherited genetic variants can identify at-risk individuals and guide medical management of these potentially fatal cardiovascular conditions.
Always read the actual study abstract and verify that the research topic matches your search criteria. Look for specific mentions of electromagnetic fields, radiation exposure, or EMF sources rather than relying solely on database categorization.
Researchers should report classification errors to database administrators and maintain rigorous verification processes when conducting literature reviews. This helps maintain the integrity and usefulness of EMF research collections for scientific and public health purposes.