6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

DNA & Genetic Damage

MYC mRNA abundance is unchanged in subcultures of HL60 cells exposed to power-line frequency magnetic fields

No Effects Found

Authors not listed · 1998

Share:

FDA replication study found no MYC gene changes from 60 Hz magnetic fields, contradicting earlier positive findings.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers at the FDA exposed HL60 cancer cells to 60 Hz magnetic fields at 6 microTesla (similar to power line levels) to test whether this EMF exposure increases MYC gene expression. Despite using methods identical to earlier studies that claimed positive effects, they found no increase in MYC expression. This failed replication raises questions about the reproducibility of some EMF biological effects.

Why This Matters

This FDA replication study highlights a critical problem in EMF research: the difficulty of reproducing claimed biological effects. The original MYC studies were among the most cited examples of power line frequency EMF causing cellular changes, yet this careful replication found nothing. The 6 microTesla exposure level used here is actually higher than what you typically encounter from power lines at your property boundary (usually 0.2-2 microTesla). The failure to replicate doesn't prove EMF is harmless, but it does demonstrate how challenging it is to establish consistent, reproducible biological mechanisms. What makes this particularly significant is that it came from FDA researchers with no apparent bias toward either proving or disproving EMF effects. The science demonstrates that many early EMF studies suffered from methodological issues that made their findings unreliable when subjected to rigorous replication attempts.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 60 Hz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (1998). MYC mRNA abundance is unchanged in subcultures of HL60 cells exposed to power-line frequency magnetic fields.
Show BibTeX
@article{myc_mrna_abundance_is_unchanged_in_subcultures_of_hl60_cells_exposed_to_power_line_frequency_magnetic_fields_ce4170,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {MYC mRNA abundance is unchanged in subcultures of HL60 cells exposed to power-line frequency magnetic fields},
  year = {1998},
  doi = {10.2307/3579641},
  
}
DOI: 10.2307/3579641PubMed: 9650598

Quick Questions About This Study

No. Despite using identical methods to earlier studies that claimed positive effects, FDA researchers found no increase in MYC gene expression when HL60 cells were exposed to 6 microTesla 60 Hz magnetic fields.
The 6 microTesla field was 3-30 times stronger than typical power line exposures at property boundaries (0.2-2 microTesla), making it a robust test of potential biological effects from household EMF sources.
The study used cells from both commercial sources and the original investigators, plus identical exposure methods. The failure to replicate suggests the original positive findings may have been due to methodological issues or experimental artifacts.
MYC is an oncogene that regulates cell growth and division. Increased MYC expression can promote cancer development, which is why earlier claims of EMF-induced MYC increases were considered potentially significant for cancer risk assessment.
Yes. Researchers used a chemical agent to confirm the cells could respond to known stimuli and that their detection system was sensitive enough to measure biological changes, validating their experimental setup.