6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Non-ionizing radiation—an introduction

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 1969

Share:

Scientists have been studying non-ionizing radiation's biological effects since 1969, long before today's ubiquitous EMF exposure.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1969 review paper provided an early scientific introduction to non-ionizing radiation, covering electromagnetic radiation types including radio frequency and infrared radiation. The research examined power levels and potential biological effects of these radiation sources. This represents foundational work in understanding EMF health effects during the early development of modern electronics.

Why This Matters

This 1969 review represents a crucial turning point in EMF science - the moment researchers first began systematically cataloging non-ionizing radiation sources and their biological effects. What makes this particularly significant is the timing: this was published just as radio frequency technology was expanding beyond military and commercial broadcasting into everyday consumer products. The science demonstrates that concerns about EMF health effects aren't new or reactionary - they've been part of the scientific discussion since the technology's early adoption. The reality is that while we had far fewer EMF sources in 1969, researchers were already recognizing the need to understand biological effects at various power levels. Today, you're exposed to exponentially more non-ionizing radiation than anyone in 1969 could have imagined, yet much of our regulatory framework still relies on this era's understanding of what constitutes 'safe' exposure levels.

Exposure Details

Power Density
10 mW/cm²

Exposure Context

This study used 10 mW/cm² for radio frequency:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 10 mW/cm²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)This level is 10 times the FCC limit

Study Details

To introduce the effects of exposure to non-ionizing radiation, recommended safe power levels, and techniques of measurement that have been developed.

Cite This Study
Unknown (1969). Non-ionizing radiation—an introduction.
Show BibTeX
@article{non_ionizing_radiation_an_introduction_g4878,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Non-ionizing radiation—an introduction},
  year = {1969},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

This review examined radio frequency radiation and infrared radiation, representing the primary non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation sources available in 1969. These formed the foundation for understanding biological effects from electromagnetic fields.
1969 marked early systematic study of non-ionizing radiation as consumer electronics began expanding. This timing was crucial as it established baseline understanding before widespread EMF exposure became commonplace in daily life.
EMF power levels in 1969 were dramatically lower than today's exposure from smartphones, WiFi, and wireless devices. This early research examined biological effects at power levels far below current everyday exposure.
Early researchers were examining how non-ionizing radiation at various power levels might affect biological systems. This foundational work established the scientific framework for understanding potential health effects from electromagnetic field exposure.
Yes, this 1969 review demonstrates that scientists were already investigating biological effects of non-ionizing radiation decades before cell phones and WiFi. Health concerns about EMF exposure have deep scientific roots.