8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Nonionizing Electromagnetic Wave Effects in Biological Materials and Systems

Bioeffects Seen

Curtis C. Johnson, Arthur W. Guy · 1972

Share:

Even in 1972, scientists recognized that electromagnetic radiation causes biological effects at levels well below those causing obvious harm.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1972 review examined electromagnetic wave effects across the entire spectrum from radio frequencies to light on biological systems. The study found that while high-intensity radiation clearly causes harm like burns and cataracts, lower-level exposures produce biological effects whose health significance remains unknown. The research also noted that some electromagnetic effects can be beneficial for medical treatments.

Why This Matters

This early review represents a pivotal moment in EMF research history, documenting the first systematic recognition that biological effects occur at radiation levels well below those causing obvious thermal damage. What makes this 1972 study particularly significant is its acknowledgment of a critical gap that persists today: we can measure biological responses to low-level EMF, but determining whether these effects constitute actual harm remains challenging. The study's observation that 'behavioral changes have been reported' at non-thermal levels foreshadowed decades of research into EMF's neurological impacts. Today's wireless devices operate at power levels that would fall squarely into this study's 'low-level effects' category, making the fundamental question raised here more relevant than ever.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

chartPage 5 - Fig. 1: Relative absorbed power density patterns in plane fat and muscle layers exposed to a plane wave source.
chartPage 6 - AI-described figure: Fig. 3: Relative absorbed power density patterns in plane fat, muscle, and bone layers exposed to a plane-wave source.
chartPage 7 - AI-described figure: Fig. 5: Absorbed power density characteristics for spherical models of brain tissue exposed to a plane wave source.
chartPage 8 - Fig. 7. Heating patterns in a cylindrical model of human arm due to a direct contact cylindrical aperture source.
diagramPage 9 - Fig. 8 illustrates instrumentation associated with man and test animals exposed to electromagnetic radiation.
diagramPage 10 - Simplified sketches of various field survey meter designs: (a) Thermocouple method and (b) Diode method.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Curtis C. Johnson, Arthur W. Guy (1972). Nonionizing Electromagnetic Wave Effects in Biological Materials and Systems.
Show BibTeX
@article{nonionizing_electromagnetic_wave_effects_in_biological_materials_and_systems_g5530,
  author = {Curtis C. Johnson and Arthur W. Guy},
  title = {Nonionizing Electromagnetic Wave Effects in Biological Materials and Systems},
  year = {1972},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The review examined effects from lower radio frequencies all the way up through the optical spectrum, covering essentially the entire range of electromagnetic radiation from radio waves to visible light.
Yes, the study noted that most electromagnetic effects are not harmful under controlled conditions and can be used therapeutically, recognizing the medical potential of electromagnetic energy.
The review documented that high-intensity electromagnetic radiation clearly causes burns, cataracts, and various chemical changes in biological tissues, establishing definitive harm thresholds for intense exposures.
Yes, the review specifically mentioned that behavioral changes had been reported from electromagnetic exposure, making this one of the earliest acknowledgments of EMF's potential neurological effects.
While biological effects were clearly occurring at lower radiation intensities, researchers could not determine whether these low-level effects were actually harmful to human health or merely detectable responses.