6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

Occupational exposures to radiofrequency radiation from RF dielectric heat sealers

Bioeffects Seen

Clinton Cox, William E. Murray, Jr., Edward P. Foley, Jr.

Share:

Exposure Details

Magnetic Field
0.094 A/m
Power Density
10 mW/cm²
Electric Field
200 V/m

Exposure Context

This study used 10 mW/cm² for radio frequency:

This study used 200 V/m for electric fields:

This study used 0.094 A/m for magnetic fields:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 10 mW/cm²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)This level is 10 times the FCC limit
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 3-100 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 3-100 MHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale
Cite This Study
Clinton Cox, William E. Murray, Jr., Edward P. Foley, Jr. (n.d.). Occupational exposures to radiofrequency radiation from RF dielectric heat sealers.
Show BibTeX
@article{occupational_exposures_to_radiofrequency_radiation_from_rf_dielectric_heat_seale_g4059,
  author = {Clinton Cox and William E. Murray and Jr. and Edward P. Foley and Jr.},
  title = {Occupational exposures to radiofrequency radiation from RF dielectric heat sealers},
  year = {n.d.},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.