Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Exposure of nerve growth factor-treated PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells to a modulated radiofrequency field at 836.55 MHz: effects on c-jun and c-fos expression.
Ivaschuk OI, Jones RA, Ishida-Jones T, Haggren W, Adey WR, Phillips JL · 1997
View Original AbstractCell phone radiation at 9 mW/cm² reduced nerve cell gene activity by 38%, showing biological effects at exposure levels comparable to device use.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed rat nerve cells to cell phone radiation at 836.55 MHz (the frequency used by early digital cell phones) to see if it would affect the activity of genes called c-fos and c-jun, which help control cell growth and responses to stress. They found mostly no effects, except for a 38% decrease in c-jun gene activity at the highest exposure level of 9 mW/cm². This suggests that cell phone radiation may have subtle effects on nerve cell gene expression, but only at relatively high exposure levels.
Why This Matters
This 1997 study is significant because it was among the first to examine how digital cell phone signals affect gene expression in nerve cells. The researchers used the actual TDMA signal format that was standard for North American cell phones at the time, making their findings more relevant to real-world exposures than studies using simple continuous waves. The 38% reduction in c-jun expression at 9 mW/cm² is noteworthy because c-jun helps regulate cell growth and stress responses. While 9 mW/cm² is higher than typical cell phone exposures to the head (which range from 0.1 to 2 mW/cm²), it's within the range that could occur with prolonged close contact. The reality is that even this early research showed measurable biological effects from cell phone radiation on nerve cells, adding to the growing body of evidence that these signals can influence cellular processes in ways we're still working to understand.
Exposure Details
- Power Density
- 0.09, 0.9, and 9 mW/cm²
- Source/Device
- 836.55 MHz
- Exposure Duration
- 20, 40, and 60 min and included an intermittent exposure regimen (20 min on/20 min off), resulting in total incubation times of 20, 60, and 100 min
Exposure Context
This study used 0.09, 0.9, and 9 mW/cm² for radio frequency:
- 9Mx above the Building Biology guideline of 0.1 μW/m²
- 150Kx above the BioInitiative Report recommendation of 0.0006 μW/cm²
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The aim of this study is to investigate Exposure of nerve growth factor-treated PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells to a modulated radiofrequency field at 836.55 MHz: effects on c-jun and c-fos expression.
Rat PC12 pheochromocytoma cells have been treated with nerve growth factor and then exposed to ather...
No change in c-fos transcript levels were detected after 20 min exposure at each field intensity (20...
Show BibTeX
@article{oi_1997_exposure_of_nerve_growth_3108,
author = {Ivaschuk OI and Jones RA and Ishida-Jones T and Haggren W and Adey WR and Phillips JL},
title = {Exposure of nerve growth factor-treated PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells to a modulated radiofrequency field at 836.55 MHz: effects on c-jun and c-fos expression.},
year = {1997},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9096840/},
}Cited By (90 papers)
- Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arraysInfluential
B. Levitt, H. Lai (2010) - 161 citations
- Microwave exposure of neuronal cells in vitro: Study of apoptosisInfluential
V. Joubert et al. (2006) - 46 citations
- Criticism of the health assessment in the ICNIRP guidelines for radiofrequency and microwave radiation (100 kHz - 300 GHz)Influential
N. Cherry (2002) - 15 citations
- Evidence that Electromagnetic Radiation is Genotoxic: The implications for the epidemiology of cancer and cardiac, neurological and reproductive effectsInfluential
N. Cherry (2002) - 15 citations
- HSP27 phosphorylation increases after 45°C or 41°C heat shocks but not after non-thermal TDMA or GSM exposuresInfluential
R. Vanderwaal et al. (2006) - 12 citations
- A New Paradigm, the physical, biological and health effects of Radiofrequency/Microwave RadiationInfluential
N. Cherry (2000) - 4 citations
- Radiofrequency radiation at 2.856 GHz does not affect key cellular endpoints in neuron-like PC12 cellsInfluential
H. Zhou et al. (2018) - 2 citations
- Evidence of health effects of electromagnetic radiation, to the Australian senate inquiry into electromagnetic radiationInfluential
N. Cherry (2000) - 2 citations
- Cataract as a side effect of unprotected exposure to microwave hyperthermia treatment of breast cancerInfluential
N. Cherry (2002)