Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
A chromosomal study of workers with long-term exposure to radio-frequency radiation.
Garson OM, McRobert TL, Campbell LJ, Hocking BA, Gordon I. · 1991
View Original AbstractTelecom workers with long-term RF exposure showed no increased chromosome damage compared to unexposed controls.
Plain English Summary
Australian researchers studied 38 telecommunications workers who had long-term occupational exposure to radio frequency radiation (the type emitted by cell towers and wireless equipment) to see if their DNA showed more chromosome damage than unexposed office workers. After examining 200 cells from each person, they found no difference in genetic damage between the two groups. This suggests that RF exposure at levels within occupational safety limits may not cause detectable chromosome damage in white blood cells.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 400 kHz-20 GHz
Study Details
To examine whether an increased level of chromosome damage occurs in the stimulated lymphocytes of radio-linemen after long-term but intermittent exposure to radio-frequency radiation (RFR) during the course of their work.
Chromosome studies were performed on blood samples from 38 radio-linemen matched by age with 38 cont...
The ratio of the rate of aberrant cells in the radio-linemen group to that in the control group was ...
Exposure to RFR at or below the described limits did not appear to cause any increase in chromosomal damage in circulating lymphocytes.
Show BibTeX
@article{om_1991_a_chromosomal_study_of_3035,
author = {Garson OM and McRobert TL and Campbell LJ and Hocking BA and Gordon I.},
title = {A chromosomal study of workers with long-term exposure to radio-frequency radiation.},
year = {1991},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1895968/},
}Cited By (48 papers)
- POTENTIAL HEALTH RISKS OF RADIOFREQUENCY FIELDS FROM WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICESInfluential
D. Krewski et al. (2001) - 23 citations
- IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300 GHz
Ieee Standards Board (1992) - 1,365 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline.
R. Aitken et al. (2005) - 315 citations
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations
- Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation
I. Yakymenko et al. (2016) - 242 citations
- Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
H. W. Ruediger (2009) - 191 citations
- Genetic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of radiofrequency fields.
Luc Verschaeve, A. Maes (1998) - 174 citations
- BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)
C. Blackman et al. (2007) - 155 citations