8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

Physiotherapy

Bioeffects Seen

D E Oliver, C R Hayne, J Mitchell, J E Gaff, J M Robinson, P M Parker, C Roche, J West · 1984

Share:

Therapeutic electromagnetic devices from 1984 used controlled pulses, unlike today's constant ambient EMF exposure.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1984 physiotherapy research examined pulsed electromagnetic energy (PEME) as a treatment modality, comparing it with ultrasound therapy for various medical conditions including spina bifida and venous ulcers. The study represents early clinical investigation into therapeutic electromagnetic field applications in rehabilitation medicine.

Why This Matters

This research highlights an important distinction often overlooked in EMF health discussions: the difference between therapeutic and incidental electromagnetic exposures. While physiotherapists in 1984 were exploring pulsed electromagnetic energy as a healing tool, most people today receive continuous, unintentional EMF exposure from devices never designed for therapeutic benefit. The reality is that therapeutic PEME devices deliver controlled, targeted pulses at specific frequencies and intensities, while everyday sources like WiFi routers and cell phones emit constant radiation at power levels and frequencies that have never been proven safe for chronic exposure. What this means for you is understanding that not all electromagnetic energy is the same - the dose, timing, and intention behind the exposure matter enormously for biological effects.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
D E Oliver, C R Hayne, J Mitchell, J E Gaff, J M Robinson, P M Parker, C Roche, J West (1984). Physiotherapy.
Show BibTeX
@article{physiotherapy_g5995,
  author = {D E Oliver and C R Hayne and J Mitchell and J E Gaff and J M Robinson and P M Parker and C Roche and J West},
  title = {Physiotherapy},
  year = {1984},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Pulsed electromagnetic energy (PEME) therapy delivers controlled electromagnetic pulses to promote healing in conditions like bone fractures, wound healing, and tissue repair. Unlike ambient EMF exposure, PEME uses specific frequencies and timing patterns designed for therapeutic benefit.
Therapeutic PEME delivers targeted, controlled pulses at specific frequencies for limited treatment periods, while everyday EMF sources like phones and WiFi emit continuous radiation at different frequencies without therapeutic intent or safety optimization for chronic exposure.
Yes, this 1984 research compared pulsed electromagnetic energy therapy with ultrasound treatment, both established physiotherapy modalities. This comparison helped evaluate the relative effectiveness of electromagnetic versus acoustic energy for therapeutic applications in rehabilitation medicine.
The study examined PEME therapy for spina bifida patients and venous ulcer treatment, among other conditions. These applications focused on wound healing, circulation improvement, and tissue repair where controlled electromagnetic stimulation might provide therapeutic benefits.
Physiotherapists recognized that controlled electromagnetic fields could stimulate cellular processes involved in healing and tissue repair. This therapeutic approach uses the body's natural bioelectrical systems, unlike random EMF exposure from consumer electronics which provides no health benefit.