8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

Present status of fever therapy

Bioeffects Seen

Bierman W. · 1948

Share:

Historical medical research shows how therapeutic approaches evolve as new evidence emerges about health risks and benefits.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1948 medical paper by Dr. Bierman examined the therapeutic use of artificially induced fever to treat infections like gonorrhea and syphilis, during the transition period when antibiotics like penicillin were becoming available. The research documented fever therapy methods and their effectiveness compared to emerging chemical treatments.

Why This Matters

While this 1948 study predates modern EMF research by decades, it represents an important historical perspective on how the medical establishment evaluates new therapeutic technologies. The science demonstrates that fever therapy was once considered cutting-edge treatment, yet was eventually replaced as better evidence emerged about antibiotic effectiveness. This parallels today's EMF health debate, where we're witnessing a similar transition period. The reality is that just as the medical community once had to weigh fever therapy against penicillin, we now must evaluate mounting evidence about EMF health effects against industry assurances of safety. What this means for you is that medical consensus can shift dramatically when independent research accumulates, and the current EMF safety standards may face similar scrutiny as more long-term health data becomes available.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Bierman W. (1948). Present status of fever therapy.
Show BibTeX
@article{present_status_of_fever_therapy_g6617,
  author = {Bierman W.},
  title = {Present status of fever therapy},
  year = {1948},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

Fever therapy was primarily used to treat serious infections including gonorrhea and syphilis before antibiotics became widely available. Doctors artificially induced high fevers to help the body fight these bacterial infections through elevated body temperature.
This research examined fever therapy during the transition period when penicillin and sulfonamide antibiotics were becoming available. The study likely compared the effectiveness and safety of traditional fever induction versus these new chemical treatments.
Fever therapy was gradually abandoned as antibiotics like penicillin proved more effective and safer for treating bacterial infections. The medical community shifted to chemical treatments that could target infections without the risks of artificially induced high fevers.
This research illustrates how medical treatments once considered standard practice can be replaced when new evidence emerges. It shows that scientific consensus evolves as researchers gather more data about treatment effectiveness and safety.
Just as fever therapy was eventually reconsidered based on accumulating evidence, current EMF safety standards may face similar scrutiny as more long-term health research becomes available and independent studies challenge existing assumptions.