6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Program for Control of Electromagnetic Pollution of the Environment: The Assessment of Biological Hazards of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 1972

Share:

Government agencies recognized electromagnetic radiation as environmental pollution requiring control programs over 50 years ago.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1972 government report outlined a comprehensive program to control electromagnetic pollution in the environment, addressing biological hazards from nonionizing electromagnetic radiation. The document represented early federal recognition of EMF as an environmental concern requiring systematic management and oversight.

Why This Matters

What makes this 1972 government report remarkable is its timing. Just as the telecommunications revolution was beginning, federal agencies were already identifying electromagnetic pollution as an environmental hazard requiring active control measures. The report's focus on biological hazards from nonionizing radiation demonstrates that concerns about EMF health effects aren't new or fringe - they've been on the government's radar for over 50 years.

The reality is that electromagnetic pollution has only intensified since 1972. Where government agencies once saw the need for environmental control programs, we now live with exponentially higher EMF exposures from WiFi, cell towers, smart devices, and 5G networks. This early recognition of EMF as pollution requiring management underscores how far we've drifted from precautionary approaches to electromagnetic radiation in our environment.

Finding

Biological effects and potential hazards of electromagnetic radiations (0 Hz ~ 3000 GHz) even at relatively low power densities are a matter of particular concern to a number of Federal agencies and non-Government organizations.

In their words

“Biological effects and potential hazards of electromagnetic radiations (0 Hz ~ 3000 GHz) even at relatively low power densities are a matter of particular concern to a number of Federal agencies and non-Government organizations.”

Exposure Details

Power Density
10 mW/cm2

Exposure Context

This study used 10 mW/cm2 for radio frequency:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 10 mW/cm2Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)This level is 10 times the FCC limit
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 0 Hz to 3000 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 0 Hz to 3000 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Study Details

To develop the necessary understanding for assessing the situation and to provide a rational scientific basis for establishing safety and remedial measures, as warranted. OTP's concern stems from its responsibilities for Government use of the spectrum; the U.S. Government being the largest single user. Inherent in these responsibilities is OTP's concern for the establishment of criteria to assure protection of the public while permitting effective use of radiative equipment.

Cite This Study
Unknown (1972). Program for Control of Electromagnetic Pollution of the Environment: The Assessment of Biological Hazards of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation.
Show BibTeX
@article{program_for_control_of_electromagnetic_pollution_of_the_environment_the_assessme_g7383,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Program for Control of Electromagnetic Pollution of the Environment: The Assessment of Biological Hazards of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation},
  year = {1972},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

ERMAC (Electromagnetic Radiation Management Advisory Council) was referenced in this government program for controlling electromagnetic pollution. The council likely provided guidance on managing biological hazards from nonionizing electromagnetic radiation in the environment.
The 1972 report identified electromagnetic radiation as environmental pollution because of documented biological hazards from nonionizing radiation exposure. This classification recognized that electromagnetic fields could contaminate and harm the natural environment.
OTP (Office of Telecommunications Policy) was involved in the 1972 program for controlling electromagnetic pollution. The office likely coordinated telecommunications policy with environmental protection measures to address biological hazards from electromagnetic radiation.
The 1972 government report addressed electromagnetic pollution when exposure levels were a fraction of today's levels. Current EMF exposures from WiFi, cell phones, and wireless devices are exponentially higher than the pollution levels that prompted federal control programs.
The 1972 report specifically mentioned biological hazards from nonionizing electromagnetic radiation as justification for environmental control programs. While specific hazards aren't detailed, the government clearly recognized potential health risks from electromagnetic field exposure.