6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Immune SystemPart of the Glaser Archive

Pulsed High Frequency and Routine Hospital Antibiotic Therapy in the Management of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: A Preliminary Report

Bioeffects Seen

Marshall Jay Lobell, M.D. · 1962

Share:

1961 study found pulsed high-frequency energy added to routine therapy shortened hospital stays for pelvic infection from 13.5 to 7.4 days.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers in 1961 treated 45 patients with pelvic inflammatory disease using pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic radiation alongside routine hospital therapy of antibiotics, sedatives, and bed rest. Patients who received the pulsed high-frequency treatment recovered more quickly, spending an average of 7.4 days in the hospital compared to 13.5 days for those receiving only conventional treatment.

Why This Matters

This 1961 study represents one of the earliest documented therapeutic applications of pulsed electromagnetic fields in clinical medicine. While the research predates our modern understanding of EMF bioeffects, it demonstrates that electromagnetic radiation can produce measurable biological responses - in this case, accelerated healing. The science shows that EMF exposure can influence cellular processes, immune function, and tissue repair mechanisms. What makes this particularly relevant today is that it occurred at a time when EMF exposure was limited and controlled, unlike our current environment of constant wireless radiation. The reality is that if targeted EMF can enhance healing under clinical conditions, then chronic, uncontrolled exposure from modern devices may also be triggering biological responses we're only beginning to understand.

Finding

The average hospital stay for the PHF-treated patients was 17.4 days, for the controls 13.5 days.

In their words

“The average hospital stay for the PHF-treated patients was 17.4 days, for the controls 13.5 days.”
Cite This Study
Marshall Jay Lobell, M.D. (1962). Pulsed High Frequency and Routine Hospital Antibiotic Therapy in the Management of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: A Preliminary Report.
Show BibTeX
@article{pulsed_high_frequency_and_routine_hospital_antibiotic_therapy_in_the_management__g6481,
  author = {Marshall Jay Lobell and M.D.},
  title = {Pulsed High Frequency and Routine Hospital Antibiotic Therapy in the Management of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: A Preliminary Report},
  year = {1962},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

This 1961 study suggests pulsed EMF may accelerate recovery from pelvic inflammatory disease when combined with antibiotics. Patients recovered in 7.4 days versus 13.5 days with antibiotics alone, though more research is needed.
The study used pulsed high-frequency (PHF) energy from a generator whose pulses last 65 microseconds with 1600 microseconds between pulses. Each treatment lasted 30 minutes, with the suprapubic, liver, and left adrenal areas receiving 10 minutes each, alongside routine hospital treatment including antibiotics, sedatives, and bed rest.
Patients receiving pulsed high-frequency therapy recovered more quickly, spending an average of 7.4 days hospitalized compared to 13.5 days for those receiving only conventional antibiotic treatment.
The 1961 study reported no untoward effects from the pulsed high-frequency treatment. However, this was a preliminary report with limited safety data compared to modern clinical trial standards.
In 1961, researchers were studying the therapeutic value of pulsed high-frequency energy added to standard therapies such as antibiotics, sedatives, and bed rest in hospitalized patients with pelvic inflammatory disease.