6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Quantifying Hazardous Microwave Fields: Analysis

Not an original health-effects study

Paul F. Wacker · 1970

Share:

Finding

The existing standards for microwave radiation hazards are based upon far-field concepts which may have little or even no validity in near fields. However, hazards occur largely in near fields, and even many dosimetry experiments are carried out in near fields. Because of the great complexity possible in a near field, a probe should, in principle, simulate the individual who might be subject to the possible hazard; however, such a probe is not feasible. Electric energy density provides a reasonable index of a large class of microwave radiation hazards and is simpler to measure in a near field than is energy flow.

In their words

“The existing standards for microwave radiation hazards are based upon far-field concepts which may have little or even no validity in near fields. However, hazards occur largely in near fields, and even many dosimetry experiments are carried out in near fields. Because of the great complexity possible in a near field, a probe should, in principle, simulate the individual who might be subject to the possible hazard; however, such a probe is not feasible. Electric energy density provides a reasonable index of a large class of microwave radiation hazards and is simpler to measure in a near field than is energy flow.”
Cite This Study
Paul F. Wacker (1970). Quantifying Hazardous Microwave Fields: Analysis.
Show BibTeX
@article{quantifying_hazardous_microwave_fields_analysis_g5600,
  author = {Paul F. Wacker},
  title = {Quantifying Hazardous Microwave Fields: Analysis},
  year = {1970},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.