Miscarriages among female physical therapists who report using radio- and microwave-frequency electromagnetic radiation.
Ouellet-Hellstrom R, Stewart WF · 1993
View Original AbstractMicrowave diathermy use around conception was associated with higher miscarriage odds (OR 1.28), while shortwave diathermy showed no association (OR 1.07).
Plain English Summary
Researchers mailed questionnaires to 42,403 physical therapists in 1989 and used a nested case-control design with 1,753 miscarriage cases matched to 1,753 controls. A pregnancy was considered exposed if the mother reported using microwave or shortwave diathermy in the six months before or during the first trimester. Microwave use was associated with increased miscarriage odds (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.59) with a dose-response trend, while shortwave diathermy was not associated (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.91-1.24).
Why This Matters
The odds ratio for microwave exposure rose to 1.59 in the highest exposure group of 20 or more exposures per month. After controlling for prior fetal loss, the microwave odds ratio was 1.26 (95% CI 1.00-1.59) and the exposure-response trend remained statistically significant. For shortwave diathermy, the highest exposure group had an odds ratio of 0.87.
Study Details
Recent studies suggest that use of shortwave diathermy is associated with an excess risk of birth defects, perinatal deaths, and late spontaneous abortions among the offspring of exposed female therapists. To assess the impact of occupational use of microwave and shortwave diathermy at the time of conception, the authors mailed questionnaires to 42,403 physical therapists in 1989.
Both occupational and reproductive histories were obtained. Exposures to shortwave and microwave dia...
Pregnancies of mothers reporting microwave use 6 months prior to the pregnancy or during the first t...
Show BibTeX
@article{r_1993_miscarriages_among_female_physical_2493,
author = {Ouellet-Hellstrom R and Stewart WF},
title = {Miscarriages among female physical therapists who report using radio- and microwave-frequency electromagnetic radiation.},
year = {1993},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8237966/},
}Cited By (117 papers)
- Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fieldsInfluential
F. Barnes, B. Greenebaum (2007) - 401 citations
- Actual or potential effects of ELF and RF/MW radiation on enhancing violence and homicide, and accelerating aging of human, animal or plant cellsInfluential
N. Cherry (2002) - 4 citations
- Evidence of health effects of electromagnetic radiation, to the Australian senate inquiry into electromagnetic radiationInfluential
N. Cherry (2000) - 2 citations
- Safety of medical device users: A study of physiotherapists’ practices, procedures and risk perceptionInfluential
S. Shah (2011) - 1 citations
- Reproductive effects from EMF/EMR exposureInfluential
N. Cherry (2002) - 1 citations
- Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)
A. Ahlbom (1998) - 3,877 citations
- ICNIRP Guidelines GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME-VARYING
Unknown authors (1998) - 1,528 citations
- IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300 GHz
Ieee Standards Board (1992) - 1,365 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs.
M. Repacholi (1998) - 385 citations