Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.
Analysis of proteome response to the mobile phone radiation in two types of human primary endothelial cells
Nylund R, Kuster N, Leszczynski D · 2010
View Original AbstractOne-hour cell phone radiation exposure at maximum allowed levels showed no immediate protein changes in blood vessel cells.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed two types of human blood vessel cells to 1800 MHz cell phone radiation at levels similar to phone use (SAR 2.0 W/kg) for one hour and examined whether this changed protein production in the cells. They found no statistically significant changes in protein expression compared to unexposed cells. This suggests that short-term cell phone radiation exposure may not immediately alter how these particular blood vessel cells function at the molecular level.
Exposure Information
The study examined exposure from: 1800 MHz GSM mobile phone
Study Details
In the present study, using as model human primary endothelial cells, we have examined whether exposure to 1800 MHz GSM mobile phone radiation can affect cell proteome.
Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells and primary human brain microvascular endothelial cel...
Exposure of primary human endothelial cells to the mobile phone radiation, 1800 MHz GSM signal for 1 hour at an average specific absorption rate of 2.0 W/kg, does not affect protein expression, when the proteomes were examined immediately after the end of the exposure and when the false discovery rate correction was applied to analysis. This observation agrees with our earlier study showing that the 1800 MHz GSM radiation exposure had only very limited effect on the proteome of human endothelial cell line EA.hy926, as compared with the effect of 900 MHz GSM radiation.
Show BibTeX
@article{r_2010_analysis_of_proteome_response_2788,
author = {Nylund R and Kuster N and Leszczynski D},
title = {Analysis of proteome response to the mobile phone radiation in two types of human primary endothelial cells},
year = {2010},
doi = {10.1186/1477-5956-8-52},
url = {https://proteomesci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-5956-8-52},
}Cited By (31 papers)
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.Influential
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations
- Electromagnetic irradiation exposure and its bioindication--an overview.Influential
O. Hänninen et al. (2011) - 12 citations
- The discrepancy between maximum in vitro exposure levels and realistic conservative exposure levels of mobile phones operating at 900/1800 MHzInfluential
G. Schmid, N. Kuster (2015) - 11 citations
- Biochemical Changes in The Intervertebral Discs After Electromagnetic Radiation: An Experimental StudyInfluential
O. Eser et al. (2012) - 2 citations
- Radiation proteomics: A brief overview
Dariusz Leszczyński (2014) - 34 citations
- Five years later: The current status of the use of proteomics and transcriptomics in EMF research
Dariusz Leszczyński et al. (2012) - 30 citations
- Staphylococcus aureus‐mediated blood–brain barrier injury: an in vitro human brain microvascular endothelial cell model
Alisha McLoughlin et al. (2017) - 29 citations
- The roles of intensity, exposure duration, and modulation on the biological effects of radiofrequency radiation and exposure guidelines
H. Lai, B. Levitt (2022) - 28 citations
- A meta-analysis of in vitro exposures to weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phones (1990-2015).
M. Halgamuge et al. (2020) - 27 citations