8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Cancer & Tumors1,133 citations

Radiat Res 149(6):637-645, 1998

No Effects Found

Authors not listed · 1998

Share:

Database error: this cancer vaccine study contains no EMF research and shouldn't influence EMF safety conclusions.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This study appears to be misclassified in the EMF database, as it actually reviews therapeutic cancer vaccines rather than electromagnetic field research. The paper discusses how cancer vaccines work by stimulating immune responses and explores methods to overcome the immunosuppressive environment that tumors create. This represents a database cataloging error rather than EMF-related health research.

Cite This Study
Unknown (1998). Radiat Res 149(6):637-645, 1998.
Show BibTeX
@article{radiat_res_1496637_645_1998_ce2920,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Radiat Res 149(6):637-645, 1998},
  year = {1998},
  doi = {10.1172/jci80009},
  
}
DOI: 10.1172/jci80009PubMed: 26214521

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a cataloging error. The study examines therapeutic cancer vaccines and immune system responses, with no electromagnetic field exposure or measurement components that would qualify it as EMF research.
No, because this study doesn't examine EMF at all. It's cancer immunotherapy research that was incorrectly classified, so it provides no information about electromagnetic field biological effects one way or another.
Misclassified studies can artificially inflate 'no effect' findings when they're not actually EMF studies. This skews meta-analyses and safety assessments, making proper study verification essential for accurate EMF health risk evaluation.
The research focuses on improving cancer vaccines by enhancing antigen delivery to immune cells and overcoming tumor-created immunosuppression. It belongs in oncology or immunology databases, not EMF research collections.
Yes, if regulatory agencies rely on flawed databases that include non-EMF studies as 'no effect' evidence, it could lead to underestimating actual biological effects and inadequate safety standards for electromagnetic field exposure.