8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Cardiovascular2,476 citations

Radiat Res 155(1):239-247, 2001.(VT, LE, GT)

No Effects Found

Authors not listed · 2001

Share:

Proper study classification is essential for meaningful EMF health research assessment and evidence-based decision making.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This appears to be a 2016 European Society of Cardiology position paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity, written in Polish. The study information provided seems incomplete or mismatched, as the abstract describes cardiology research rather than EMF effects, and shows no electromagnetic field exposure or biological effects.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2001). Radiat Res 155(1):239-247, 2001.(VT, LE, GT).
Show BibTeX
@article{radiat_res_1551239_247_2001vt_le_gt_ce2987,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Radiat Res 155(1):239-247, 2001.(VT, LE, GT)},
  year = {2001},
  doi = {10.1093/eurheartj/ehw211},
  
}
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw211PubMed: 27910076

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a database classification error. The abstract describes cardiovascular toxicity from cancer treatments, not electromagnetic field exposure, suggesting it was incorrectly categorized as EMF research.
ESC Position Papers are expert consensus documents from the European Society of Cardiology that provide clinical guidance based on current evidence, typically covering treatment protocols and safety considerations for cardiovascular medicine.
While some EMF studies examine cardiovascular effects, this particular paper focuses on toxicity from cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation therapy, not electromagnetic field exposure from devices or infrastructure.
Database errors occur when automated systems or manual entry mistakes categorize unrelated medical research as EMF studies, potentially affecting meta-analyses and systematic reviews of electromagnetic field health effects.
Researchers should verify study abstracts match claimed EMF exposure parameters, report misclassifications to database administrators, and exclude irrelevant papers from systematic reviews to maintain research integrity and accuracy.