8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION HAZARDS

Bioeffects Seen

U. M. SALATI, A. ANNE, H. P. SCHWAN · 1962

Share:

This 1962 study helped establish thermal-based RF safety standards that still influence today's regulations despite decades of non-thermal research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1962 research by Schwan and colleagues examined radio frequency radiation hazards, focusing on thermal effects and establishing permissible dose levels for human exposure. The study investigated how electromagnetic energy is absorbed by the human body and developed safety guidelines for RF radiation exposure.

Why This Matters

This foundational 1962 research represents some of the earliest systematic investigation into RF radiation hazards, published during the dawn of the microwave age when radar and early wireless technologies were proliferating. The focus on thermal effects and 'permissible dose' levels reflects the scientific understanding of that era, which primarily considered heating as the main biological concern from RF exposure. What makes this historically significant is that it helped establish the thermal-only paradigm that still dominates regulatory thinking today. However, decades of subsequent research have revealed non-thermal biological effects at exposure levels well below those that cause measurable heating. The reality is that while this early work provided important safety foundations, our understanding of RF bioeffects has evolved dramatically since 1962, yet many current safety standards remain rooted in this thermal-focused approach.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

diagramPage 1 - AI-described figure: Figure 1 illustrates a diagram showing power variation over a subject in relation to distance and field strength.
p. 1 of the original PDF
diagramPage 2 - AI-described figure: A diagram illustrating a single-sideband suppressed-carrier optical modulation setup using two electro-optic modulator elements.
p. 2 of the original PDF
chartPage 4 - Fig. 2: Variation of relative absorption cross section with size parameter and thickness of fat layer at 400 megacycles.
p. 4 of the original PDF
chartPage 6 - Fig. 4: Variation of relative absorption cross section with size parameter and thickness of fat layer at 10 gigacycles.
p. 6 of the original PDF
graphPage 7 - Figure 5: Relative absorption cross section as a function of sphere distance from the antenna aperture.
p. 7 of the original PDF
chartPage 8 - Figure 1: Range of gain variation of a PPM focused medium noise figure tube. Shaded area represents the spec. requirements.
p. 8 of the original PDF

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 300 MHz to 10 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 300 MHz to 10 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study. Duration: more than one hour for tolerance dosage of 0.01w/cm? and intermittent exposure of less than one hour duration for tolerance dosage of 0.01w-hrs./cm?

Study Details

To establish safe limits and methods for measurement of radio frequency radiation hazards, and to determine the relative absorption cross section of mankind for different frequencies and exposure conditions.

Theoretical and experimental studies of relative absorption cross section of mankind using electrica...

Relative absorption cross section varied from 30% to 100% depending on frequency. For spherical and ...

Adult man will absorb 50 to 125% of the incident energy in the frequency range of biological interest (300 mc to 10 cc) and particular values in this range will depend on frequency, thickness of skin and subcutaneous fat. The shape of man is more nearly between that of an infinite cylinder and a sphere, so appropriate values of relative absorption cross section should lie between the mentioned ranges. The experimental work on homogeneous doll phantoms gave values of S of 50 to 60%. It is reasonable to believe that a 3-layered phantom which would more closely resemble man would have given higher values perhaps in the region of 50 to 125% which has been previously predicted theoretically.

Cite This Study
U. M. SALATI, A. ANNE, H. P. SCHWAN (1962). RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION HAZARDS.
Show BibTeX
@article{radio_frequency_radiation_hazards_g6856,
  author = {U. M. SALATI and A. ANNE and H. P. SCHWAN},
  title = {RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION HAZARDS},
  year = {1962},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The study focused on heating effects from radio frequency radiation absorption in human tissue, investigating how electromagnetic energy creates thermal responses and establishing what were considered safe exposure levels based on temperature increases.
Scientists used absorption cross section measurements to determine how much electromagnetic energy human tissue absorbs, then established permissible dose limits based on preventing harmful thermal effects from RF radiation exposure.
This early study helped establish the thermal-only approach to RF safety standards that still influences regulations today, focusing exclusively on heating effects rather than non-thermal biological responses discovered in later decades.
Researchers investigated absorption cross sections to measure how human tissue absorbs radio frequency electromagnetic energy, developing mathematical models to predict thermal effects from various RF radiation exposure scenarios.
The 1962 thermal-focused approach established foundations for current safety standards, but decades of research have since revealed non-thermal biological effects occurring at exposure levels well below those causing measurable heating.