8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

Reference data for radio-frequency emission hazard analysis

Bioeffects Seen

Tell R A · 1972

Share:

This 1972 government analysis established early RF hazard assessment methods when exposure was mainly occupational, not the 24/7 wireless world we inhabit today.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1972 government report compiled reference data for analyzing radiofrequency radiation hazards, examining human health effects, animal studies, and workplace safety practices. The research focused on establishing baseline information for RF emission safety standards and engineering controls. This early work helped shape our understanding of electromagnetic radiation risks in occupational and public settings.

Why This Matters

This 1972 government report represents a pivotal moment in EMF health research - one of the first comprehensive efforts to systematically analyze radiofrequency hazards. What makes this significant is the timing: this was published when RF exposure was primarily an occupational concern, decades before cell phones, WiFi, and wireless devices became ubiquitous in our daily lives. The report's focus on workplace practices and engineering controls shows that even 50 years ago, scientists recognized the need for protective measures against RF radiation.

The reality is that RF exposure levels today dwarf what researchers were concerned about in 1972. Where they studied occupational exposures to radio transmitters and industrial equipment, we now carry powerful RF transmitters in our pockets and live surrounded by wireless signals 24/7. This foundational research established safety principles that remain relevant, yet our exposure landscape has fundamentally changed in ways these early researchers never anticipated.

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 10 MHz to 300 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 10 MHz to 300 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Study Details

To provide a single source collection of information helpful in the practical evaluation of environmental radiofrequency exposure levels from various emitters, including graphs and tables indicating relationships between selected parameters.

The document employs theoretical evaluation methods incorporating source parameters, geographical fa...

The document presents various graphs and tables showing relationships between power density, field s...

The document establishes general guidelines for exposure to radiofrequency energy and provides practical tools for evaluating environmental exposure levels, though it notes that current biological effects research precludes specific conclusions about hazardous levels and frequencies.

Cite This Study
Tell R A (1972). Reference data for radio-frequency emission hazard analysis.
Show BibTeX
@article{reference_data_for_radio_frequency_emission_hazard_analysis_g4975,
  author = {Tell R A},
  title = {Reference data for radio-frequency emission hazard analysis},
  year = {1972},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

Scientists examined RF emissions from radio transmitters, industrial heating equipment, and other occupational sources. This was before consumer wireless devices existed, so the focus was on workplace exposures and establishing safety protocols for workers operating RF equipment.
RF exposure in 1972 was primarily occupational and intermittent, unlike today's constant exposure from cell phones, WiFi, and wireless devices. Modern consumers experience RF radiation levels and durations that were unimaginable when this foundational safety research was conducted.
The report focused on workplace safety measures like proper shielding, distance controls, and exposure time limits for workers near RF equipment. These engineering approaches recognized that RF radiation posed health risks requiring active management and protective measures.
Animal studies provided controlled evidence of biological effects from RF exposure that couldn't be ethically tested in humans. This toxicity data helped establish exposure limits and safety standards by showing measurable health impacts in laboratory conditions.
This early hazard analysis established fundamental principles for RF safety assessment that still underpin current regulations. However, these standards were developed for occasional occupational exposure, not the continuous consumer exposure patterns we experience with modern wireless technology.