6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Results of Clinical Surveys for Microwave Ocular Effects

Bioeffects Seen

Colonel Budd Appleton · 1973

Share:

A 1973 survey of about 1,000 military personnel found no statistically significant differences in ocular findings between those occupationally exposed to microwaves and controls.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1973 report by Colonel Budd Appleton described clinical surveys of military personnel working with radar equipment, conducted to determine whether microwave exposure causes ocular effects. About 1,000 individuals were examined at multiple military locations, and exposed and control groups were compared on opacities, vacuoles, and posterior subcapsular iridescence. The preliminary results showed no statistically significant differences in ocular findings between exposed and control populations.

Why This Matters

This report is a preliminary null result: no statistically significant differences in occurrence of opacities, vacuoles, and posterior subcapsular iridescence between exposed and control populations. In older age groups (60-69), some differences were observed but they were not statistically significant. Almost 90% of individuals in both the exposed and control groups showed opacities when different diagnostic criteria were used, which is why the authors emphasize standardized diagnostic criteria and examiner calibration. The authors also say they are not happy with their current sample size and would like several thousand individuals before drawing definitive conclusions.

Finding

The energy that we will talk about today (microwave) has been defined several different ways. So that we are all off on the same foot, I would like to stop for a moment and call your attention to the electromagnetic spectrum, figure 1.

In their words

“The energy that we will talk about today (microwave) has been defined several different ways. So that we are all off on the same foot, I would like to stop for a moment and call your attention to the electromagnetic spectrum, figure 1.”

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagram extracted from the original research document.

chartPage 8 - AI-described figure: A chart showing the electromagnetic spectrum with various energy types and their corresponding wavelengths in angstroms (Å) or meters (m).

Study Details

To determine if there are ocular effects from microwave exposure in military personnel working with radar equipment

Clinical surveys of military personnel exposed to microwaves at Fort Monmouth, White Sands Missile R...

Study examined approximately 1,000 individuals across multiple military locations. Data showed no st...

Preliminary results indicate no statistically significant differences in ocular findings between populations occupationally exposed to microwaves and controls. The study emphasizes the need for standardized diagnostic criteria and examiner calibration. The authors note that they are not happy with their current sample size and would like several thousand individuals before drawing definitive conclusions.

Cite This Study
Colonel Budd Appleton (1973). Results of Clinical Surveys for Microwave Ocular Effects.
Show BibTeX
@article{results_of_clinical_surveys_for_microwave_ocular_effects_g5843,
  author = {Colonel Budd Appleton},
  title = {Results of Clinical Surveys for Microwave Ocular Effects},
  year = {1973},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The surveys found no statistically significant differences in ocular findings between military personnel occupationally exposed to microwaves and matched controls. The results were described as preliminary, based on about 1,000 individuals.
Personnel working with radar equipment at military sites were examined. Population identification was based on likelihood of exposure to microwaves as determined by health physics workers, and controls were matched by age and sex with individuals who had no known exposure to microwaves.
About 1,000 individuals were examined at Fort Monmouth, White Sands Missile Range, Fort Bliss, Olmsted Air Force Base, Tobyhanna Depot, and Fort Huachuca. The authors would like several thousand individuals before drawing definitive conclusions.
Three diagnostic criteria were used: opacity, vacuoles, and posterior subcapsular iridescence. Data showed no statistically significant differences in occurrence of these findings between exposed and control populations, and almost 90% of individuals in both groups showed opacities under different diagnostic criteria.
The authors call the results preliminary and say they are not happy with their current sample size, wanting several thousand individuals before drawing definitive conclusions. They also emphasize the need for standardized diagnostic criteria and examiner calibration.