Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline.
Aitken RJ, Bennetts LE, Sawyer D, Wiklendt AM, King BV. · 2005
View Original AbstractMice exposed to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation showed significant DNA damage in sperm detected by QPCR, even though sperm number, morphology, and vitality were not significantly affected.
Plain English Summary
Researchers exposed mice to 900 MHz RFEMR at a specific absorption rate of approximately 90 mW/kg inside a waveguide for 7 days at 12 h per day. Sperm number, morphology, and vitality were not significantly affected by the exposure. However, detailed DNA analysis using QPCR revealed statistically significant damage to both the mitochondrial genome and the nuclear beta-globin locus.
Why This Matters
DNA damage to caudal epididymal spermatozoa was assessed by quantitative PCR as well as alkaline and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Gel electrophoresis revealed no gross evidence of increased single- or double-DNA strand breakage in spermatozoa taken from treated animals. The more sensitive QPCR method did detect statistically significant damage to both the mitochondrial genome and the nuclear beta-globin locus. The researchers concluded that while RFEMR does not have a dramatic impact on male germ cell development, a significant genotoxic effect on epididymal spermatozoa is evident and deserves further investigation.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 0.09 W/kg
- Source/Device
- 900 MHz
- Exposure Duration
- 7 days at 12 h per day.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Study Details
The aim of this study is to observe Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline.
In this study, mice were exposed to 900 MHz RFEMR at a specific absorption rate of approximately 90 ...
The treated mice were overtly normal and all assessment criteria, including sperm number, morphology...
This study suggests that while RFEMR does not have a dramatic impact on male germ cell development, a significant genotoxic effect on epididymal spermatozoa is evident and deserves further investigation.
Show BibTeX
@article{rj_2005_impact_of_radio_frequency_799,
author = {Aitken RJ and Bennetts LE and Sawyer D and Wiklendt AM and King BV.},
title = {Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline.},
year = {2005},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15910543/},
}Cited By (313 papers)
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.Influential
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations
- Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: an in vitro study.Influential
O. Eroğul et al. (2006) - 285 citations
- Cell phones: modern man's nemesis?Influential
K. Makker et al. (2009) - 78 citations
- Effects of 220 MHz Pulsed Modulated Radiofrequency Field on the Sperm Quality in RatsInfluential
Ling Guo et al. (2019) - 28 citations
- Genotoxic Risks to Male Reproductive Health from Radiofrequency RadiationInfluential
P. Kaur et al. (2023) - 25 citations
- Electromagnetic Irradiation Evokes Physiological and Molecular Alterations in RiceInfluential
Ardhendu Kundu et al. (2021) - 14 citations
- Key Scientific Evidence and Public Health Policy RecommendationsInfluential
D. Carpenter (2012) - 8 citations
- Cytogenetic and Carcinogenic Effects of Exposure to Radiofrequency RadiationInfluential
J. McNamee, P. Bellier (2007) - 8 citations
- ULTRASTRUCTURAL CHANGES IN RAT TESTICULAR TISSUE AFTER WHOLE BODY EXPOSURE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION EMITTED FROM MOBILE PHONESInfluential
Pradeep Kumar, V. Shukla (2014) - 5 citations
- Chapter 3 MOBILE TELEPHONY RADIATION EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMSInfluential
Dimitris J. Panagopoulos, L. Margaritis (2008) - 1 citations