8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Sambucci M, Laudisi F, Nasta F, Pinto R, Lodato R, Lopresto V, Altavista P, Marino C, Pioli C

No Effects Found

Authors not listed · 2011

Share:

Computer models show fetal cell phone radiation exposure stays below current safety limits, but those limits weren't designed for developing babies.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

Researchers used computer modeling to calculate how much cell phone radiation reaches developing fetuses at 7, 9, and 11 weeks of pregnancy when mothers use mobile phones. They found that radiation absorption in all fetal tissues stayed well below current safety limits set by international guidelines.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2011). Sambucci M, Laudisi F, Nasta F, Pinto R, Lodato R, Lopresto V, Altavista P, Marino C, Pioli C.
Show BibTeX
@article{sambucci_m_laudisi_f_nasta_f_pinto_r_lodato_r_lopresto_v_altavista_p_marino_c_pioli_c_ce3849,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Sambucci M, Laudisi F, Nasta F, Pinto R, Lodato R, Lopresto V, Altavista P, Marino C, Pioli C},
  year = {2011},
  doi = {10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3404369},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The study found fetal SAR values remained well below 80 mW/kg across all tested scenarios for 7, 9, and 11-week-old fetuses, regardless of phone position or frequency used.
No significant difference was found. When researchers replaced fetal models with uterine tissue of the same size and location, SAR values were only marginally different from fetal absorption rates.
Researchers used an Inverted F Antenna (IFA), which is the most commonly used antenna design in mobile phones, to simulate realistic exposure conditions during typical phone use.
The models used realistic fetal shapes from actual ultrasound images and placed them in detailed electromagnetic models of a 26-year-old woman's body for more accurate exposure calculations.
No. The 80 mW/kg ICNIRP limit referenced was established for general adult exposure based on heating effects, not the unique biological vulnerabilities of rapidly developing fetal tissues.