8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Sanie-Jahromi F, Saadat I, Saadat M

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2016

Share:

This genomics research erratum contains no EMF-related findings and appears misclassified in electromagnetic field databases.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This appears to be an erratum (correction) for a major genomics research paper about clinical sequencing, not an EMF study. The original paper discussed accelerating genomic medicine practices through the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. This correction notice does not contain any EMF-related research findings.

Why This Matters

This entry appears to be misclassified in the EMF research database. The paper is actually an erratum for a genomics study about clinical DNA sequencing practices, with no connection to electromagnetic field research. This highlights an important issue in EMF research databases - proper categorization is crucial for researchers and the public to access relevant studies. When evaluating EMF health effects, it's essential to focus on actual electromagnetic field exposure studies rather than unrelated medical research that may have been incorrectly tagged or categorized.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2016). Sanie-Jahromi F, Saadat I, Saadat M.
Show BibTeX
@article{sanie_jahromi_f_saadat_i_saadat_m_ce4200,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Sanie-Jahromi F, Saadat I, Saadat M},
  year = {2016},
  doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.06.002},
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

This appears to be a database classification error. The study focuses on clinical DNA sequencing practices, not electromagnetic field exposure or health effects. Proper categorization is essential for EMF research databases.
CSER studies genomic medicine practices, specifically how to implement clinical DNA sequencing in healthcare settings. This research involves genetic testing protocols, not electromagnetic field exposure studies.
No, this erratum corrects a genomics paper about clinical sequencing practices. It contains no electromagnetic field research, exposure data, or health effects related to EMF sources.
Misclassified studies dilute research databases and make it harder to find relevant EMF health studies. Proper categorization helps researchers and the public access accurate electromagnetic field exposure data.
Look for studies that specify EMF source, frequency, exposure duration, and biological endpoints. Legitimate EMF research measures electromagnetic field exposure and its effects on living organisms or systems.