6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

SAR versus S(inc): What is the appropriate RF exposure metric in the range 1-10 GHz? Part II: Using complex human body models

Not an original health-effects study

Authors not listed · 2010

Share:

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 1-10 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 1-10 GHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2010). SAR versus S(inc): What is the appropriate RF exposure metric in the range 1-10 GHz? Part II: Using complex human body models.
Show BibTeX
@article{sar_versus_sinc_what_is_the_appropriate_rf_exposure_metric_in_the_range_1_10_ghz_part_ii_using_complex_human_body_models_ce782,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {SAR versus S(inc): What is the appropriate RF exposure metric in the range 1-10 GHz? Part II: Using complex human body models},
  year = {2010},
  doi = {10.1002/bem.20574},
  
}