Prevalence of headache among handheld cellular telephone users in singapore: A community study.
Chia SE, Chia HP, Tan JS · 2000
View Original AbstractCell phone users show 31% higher headache rates, with hands-free equipment reducing symptoms by over 20%.
Plain English Summary
Researchers surveyed 808 people in Singapore to compare headache rates between cell phone users and non-users. They found that cell phone users were 31% more likely to experience headaches, with the risk increasing based on daily usage time. Importantly, people who used hands-free equipment had 20% fewer headaches than those who held phones directly to their heads.
Why This Matters
This early community study from Singapore provides compelling evidence that cell phone radiation exposure affects the brain in measurable ways. The dose-response relationship - where longer daily usage correlated with higher headache rates - strengthens the case for a causal connection rather than coincidence. What makes this research particularly valuable is the practical finding about hands-free equipment reducing symptoms by over 20%. This demonstrates that distance from the radiation source matters, which aligns with the physics of how electromagnetic energy dissipates. The study's design, surveying an entire community rather than just patients already experiencing symptoms, gives us a clearer picture of real-world impacts across the general population.
Exposure Information
Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.
Study Details
We carried out a cross-sectional community study in Singapore to determine the prevalence of specific central nervous system (CNS) symptoms among hand-held cellular telephone (HP) users compared to nonusers and to study the association of risk factors and CNS symptoms among HP users.
A total of 808 men and women between 12 and 70 years of age, who lived in one community, were select...
The prevalence of HP users was 44.8%. Headache was the most prevalent symptom among HP users compare...
Show BibTeX
@article{se_2000_prevalence_of_headache_among_1977,
author = {Chia SE and Chia HP and Tan JS},
title = {Prevalence of headache among handheld cellular telephone users in singapore: A community study.},
year = {2000},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11102297/},
}Cited By (125 papers)
- Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fieldsInfluential
F. Barnes, B. Greenebaum (2007) - 401 citations
- Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and subjective health complaints associated with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication--a literature review published between 2000 and 2004.Influential
H. Seitz et al. (2005) - 131 citations
- Effects of low-level radio-frequency (3kHz to 300GHz) energy on human cardiovascular, reproductive, immune, and other systems: a review of the recent literature.Influential
J. Jauchem (2008) - 123 citations
- Cohort study on the effects of everyday life radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure on non-specific symptoms and tinnitus.Influential
P. Frei et al. (2012) - 60 citations
- Cognitive function and symptoms in adults and adolescents in relation to rf radiation from UMTS base stationsInfluential
I. Riddervold et al. (2008) - 55 citations
- Study on the Feasibility of Epidemiological Studies on Health Effects of Mobile Telephone Base Stations - Final reportInfluential
G. Neubauer et al. (2005) - 23 citations
- Why electrohypersensitivity and related symptoms are caused by non-ionizing man-made electromagnetic fields: An overview and medical assessment.Influential
D. Belpomme, P. Irigaray (2022) - 20 citations
- Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz”
William H. Bailey et al. (2019) - 594 citations
- Epidemiology of Health Effects of Radiofrequency Exposure
A. Ahlbom et al. (2004) - 374 citations
- Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.
Iarc Monographs (2013) - 309 citations