8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General566 citations

Sharma A, Sisodia R, Bhatnagar D, Saxena VK

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2014

Share:

This is not an EMF health study but funding acknowledgments from particle physics research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This appears to be a funding acknowledgments section from a physics research paper rather than an EMF health study. The text lists dozens of international funding agencies and institutions that supported particle physics research, not electromagnetic field health effects research.

Why This Matters

What we have here isn't actually an EMF health study at all, but rather the funding acknowledgments section from what appears to be a high-energy physics paper, likely from CERN or a similar particle physics collaboration. This highlights an important issue in EMF research databases: the challenge of distinguishing between legitimate health research and unrelated scientific work that happens to mention electromagnetic fields in a physics context. The reality is that particle physics research, while involving electromagnetic phenomena, has no bearing on the health effects of everyday EMF exposure from cell phones, WiFi, or power lines. This kind of misclassification can muddy the waters when people are trying to understand the real science on EMF health effects.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2014). Sharma A, Sisodia R, Bhatnagar D, Saxena VK.
Show BibTeX
@article{sharma_a_sisodia_r_bhatnagar_d_saxena_vk_ce3480,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Sharma A, Sisodia R, Bhatnagar D, Saxena VK},
  year = {2014},
  doi = {10.1103/PHYSREVD.89.092007},
  
}
DOI: 10.1103/PHYSREVD.89.092007

Quick Questions About This Study

Database classification errors can occur when physics papers mentioning electromagnetic phenomena get mistakenly categorized as health studies. This creates confusion between fundamental physics research and EMF health effects research, which study completely different phenomena.
No, CERN's high-energy particle physics research has no relevance to EMF health effects from consumer devices. The electromagnetic fields used in particle accelerators operate at completely different scales and contexts than everyday EMF exposure.
Look for studies that specifically examine biological effects, use living organisms as test subjects, measure health endpoints, and involve EMF frequencies relevant to consumer devices like cell phones, WiFi, or power lines.
This funding acknowledgment lists physics institutions and particle accelerator facilities, not medical schools, health agencies, or biological research centers that typically fund EMF health studies. The focus is clearly on fundamental physics research.
Funding acknowledgments alone provide no scientific data about health effects. Only studies with actual research methods, biological subjects, and health outcome measurements should be included in EMF health research databases.