8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

SHORT WAVE THERAPY IN PYOGENIC SKIN INFECTIONS

Bioeffects Seen

TIBOR DE CHOLNOKY · 1935

Share:

1935 doctors used RF therapy to treat skin infections, showing EMF biological effects were recognized medically long before safety concerns.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1935 study investigated using short wave radio frequency therapy to treat pyogenic skin infections, including furuncles (boils). The research examined whether RF electromagnetic fields could provide therapeutic benefits for bacterial skin conditions. This represents early medical use of RF energy, decades before concerns about EMF health effects emerged.

Why This Matters

This historical study reveals how dramatically our understanding of electromagnetic fields has evolved. In 1935, doctors were actively using short wave RF energy as a medical treatment, believing it could heal bacterial infections. The irony is striking - what physicians once prescribed as medicine, we now recognize as a potential health concern requiring precautionary measures.

The reality is that RF fields at therapeutic intensities are vastly more powerful than what we encounter from modern devices like cell phones or WiFi routers. Yet this early medical application demonstrates that electromagnetic fields do have biological effects - they can influence cellular processes and tissue healing. The question isn't whether EMF affects biology (it clearly does), but rather at what exposure levels and frequencies these effects become harmful rather than helpful.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagram extracted from the original research document.

diagramPage 4 - Figure 1 displays a sequence of images showing furuncles on the chest wall at different stages after short wave treatment.
p. 4 of the original PDF

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 10 to 100 MHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 10 to 100 MHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study. Duration: 10-30 minutes daily

Study Details

To evaluate the effectiveness of short wave therapy in treating pyogenic skin infections including furuncles, carbuncles, axillary sweat gland infections, erysipelas, and erysipeloid.

Short wave therapy using high frequency currents of 10 to 100 million frequencies or wavelengths of ...

Furuncles: Average of 2-6 treatments, average duration until cure 4.6 days. Carbuncles: Healed in 8-...

Short wave therapy is a valuable adjunct to the management of pyogenic skin infections. Surgical intervention becomes unnecessary in most cases, clinical course is abbreviated, and treatment terminates with good cosmetic results. The therapy is simple, safe, and effective, especially in diabetic patients.

Cite This Study
TIBOR DE CHOLNOKY (1935). SHORT WAVE THERAPY IN PYOGENIC SKIN INFECTIONS.
Show BibTeX
@article{short_wave_therapy_in_pyogenic_skin_infections_g5560,
  author = {TIBOR DE CHOLNOKY},
  title = {SHORT WAVE THERAPY IN PYOGENIC SKIN INFECTIONS},
  year = {1935},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The study focused on pyogenic skin infections, particularly furuncles (boils). These are bacterial infections that cause pus-filled bumps on the skin. Doctors believed short wave RF energy could help heal these infected areas.
Medical short wave therapy used much higher power levels than today's consumer devices. While your phone emits milliwatts, therapeutic RF devices delivered watts of energy directly to tissue for healing purposes.
Early 20th century physicians believed electromagnetic fields could stimulate healing and kill bacteria through heat generation and cellular stimulation. This was before antibiotics became widely available for treating infections.
It demonstrates that electromagnetic fields clearly have biological effects - doctors wouldn't have used them medically otherwise. The key question is determining safe versus harmful exposure levels and frequencies.
Yes, it was considered a legitimate medical treatment. However, 1930s safety standards were minimal compared to today's understanding of EMF risks and the precautionary principle we now apply.