8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Whole Body / General4,757 citations

Speit G, Richard Gminski, Tauber R

No Effects Found

Authors not listed · 2013

Share:

Database error: this cosmology study about cosmic radiation is unrelated to EMF health research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This appears to be a cosmology study analyzing cosmic microwave background radiation from the Planck satellite, not an EMF health study. The research examined the universe's fundamental parameters and structure, finding support for standard cosmological models. This study has no relevance to electromagnetic field health effects or biological systems.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2013). Speit G, Richard Gminski, Tauber R.
Show BibTeX
@article{speit_g_richard_gminski_tauber_r_ce3040,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Speit G, Richard Gminski, Tauber R},
  year = {2013},
  doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/201321591},
  
}
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321591

Quick Questions About This Study

No, cosmic microwave background radiation is extremely weak ancient light from the universe's formation. It's billions of times weaker than typical EMF exposures from technology and poses no health risks to humans on Earth.
Cosmic microwave background is uniform, ancient radiation at 2.7 Kelvin temperature, while cell phone EMF is localized, artificial radiation at much higher power levels. They operate at completely different scales and biological relevance.
This appears to be a database classification error. Cosmological studies of space radiation are fundamentally different from EMF health research examining biological effects of technology-generated electromagnetic fields on living organisms.
No, Planck studied cosmic background radiation for cosmology, not biological EMF effects. The measurement techniques and radiation sources are entirely different from EMF health research methodologies and exposure scenarios.
Generally no. Space radiation studies focus on cosmic phenomena at astronomical scales, while terrestrial EMF health research examines localized exposures from devices like phones, WiFi routers, and power lines affecting biological systems.