8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

Statement of the Problem

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 1978

Share:

Scientists documented non-thermal biological effects from microwave radiation over 45 years ago, yet current safety standards still focus mainly on heating.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1978 technical report examined microwave and radiofrequency radiation's biological effects, focusing on both thermal (heating) and non-thermal effects on living systems. The research contributed to developing exposure standards during a critical period when scientists were establishing safety guidelines for RF technology. This work helped shape our understanding of how microwave radiation interacts with biological tissue beyond simple heating effects.

Why This Matters

This 1978 report represents a pivotal moment in EMF science when researchers were grappling with evidence that microwave radiation could affect biology through mechanisms other than heating. The science demonstrates that even in the late 1970s, scientists recognized non-thermal effects as a legitimate concern requiring investigation. What this means for you is that concerns about RF radiation affecting your health aren't new or fringe - they've been documented in scientific literature for over four decades. The reality is that while this early research laid important groundwork, many of the biological mechanisms identified then still aren't adequately reflected in today's safety standards, which remain based primarily on preventing tissue heating rather than addressing the full spectrum of biological interactions.

Finding

Animal studies indicate that some biological systems exhibit responses to microwave exposure of less than 10 mW/cm2. (See Table II) Although the mechanism of this response and the implication of these results to human health are not clear, it is clear that the pre-1970 basis for standards leading to the 10 mW/cm2 ANSI guideline are not valid, at least for certain frequencies.

In their words

“Animal studies indicate that some biological systems exhibit responses to microwave exposure of less than 10 mW/cm2. (See Table II) Although the mechanism of this response and the implication of these results to human health are not clear, it is clear that the pre-1970 basis for standards leading to the 10 mW/cm2 ANSI guideline are not valid, at least for certain frequencies.”

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagram extracted from the original research document.

chartPage 7 - AI-described figure: A chart listing various applications and uses for different frequency ranges in microwave technology.
p. 7 of the original PDF

Exposure Information

A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 100 MHz to 18 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 100 MHz to 18 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Unknown (1978). Statement of the Problem.
Show BibTeX
@article{statement_of_the_problem_g4064,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {Statement of the Problem},
  year = {1978},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The 1978 research documented biological effects from microwave radiation that occurred without tissue heating, including cellular changes and physiological responses. These findings challenged the assumption that only thermal effects mattered for safety standards.
This research contributed to early exposure standard development by documenting both thermal and non-thermal biological effects. However, regulatory agencies ultimately based standards primarily on preventing heating rather than addressing all documented biological interactions.
The late 1970s marked a critical period when scientists were systematically documenting biological effects from RF radiation. This research helped establish that microwave interactions with living tissue were more complex than simple heating.
The 1978 technical report examined various microwave and radiofrequency ranges used in emerging technologies of that era. The research aimed to understand biological effects across the RF spectrum relevant to human exposure.
The biological mechanisms identified in 1978 research remain relevant today as we use similar RF frequencies in cell phones, WiFi, and other wireless devices. Many of the non-thermal effects documented then still aren't adequately addressed in current safety standards.