8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

Strahlenbelastung der Augen des Röntgenologen bei Thorax- und Magendurchleuchtungen

Bioeffects Seen

Macherauch E, Thelen PO · 1959

Share:

1959 research measuring eye radiation exposure in radiologists helped establish occupational safety protocols still used today.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1959 German study measured radiation exposure to radiologists' eyes during fluoroscopy procedures of the chest and stomach. The research documented occupational X-ray exposure levels that medical professionals received while performing these common diagnostic imaging procedures. This early work helped establish understanding of radiation risks in medical settings.

Why This Matters

This pioneering 1959 research represents crucial early documentation of occupational radiation exposure in medicine. While X-rays operate at much higher frequencies than the radiofrequency EMF we encounter from phones and WiFi, this study illustrates an important principle: medical professionals recognized radiation exposure risks decades ago and took steps to measure and minimize them. The reality is that radiologists today wear protective equipment and follow strict exposure protocols precisely because early studies like this one demonstrated measurable health risks. What this means for you is that the medical community has a long history of taking radiation exposure seriously when evidence warrants concern. The same scientific rigor that led to X-ray safety protocols should guide our approach to the growing body of research on radiofrequency EMF from wireless devices.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

chartPage 4 - AI-described figure: A chart showing maximum permissible exposure times for different field sizes and tube voltages in X-ray imaging.
p. 4 of the original PDF
graphPage 5 - AI-described figure: Figure 3 illustrates dose rates in relation to distance from a fluorescent screen for various tube voltages and field sizes.
p. 5 of the original PDF
chartPage 6 - AI-described figure: A chart showing dose rates for lung phantom at different distances from a light screen with varying kilovoltages (KV) and field sizes.
p. 6 of the original PDF
graphPage 7 - AI-described figure: Figure 5 illustrates dose rates under various fluoroscopy conditions in relation to the distance from the fluorescent screen for different tube voltages.
p. 7 of the original PDF
graphPage 8 - AI-described figure: A graph showing dose rates in r/sec as a function of tube voltage (kV) for different phantoms.
p. 8 of the original PDF
chartPage 9 - AI-described figure: Maximum allowable fluoroscopy times for reaching 0.1 r/week at a distance of 25 cm from the screen, for different field sizes and tube voltages (70-90 kV), comparing thorax and stomach phantoms.
p. 9 of the original PDF

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study. Duration: 15 hours/week

Study Details

To determine radiation dose to the eyes of radiologists during fluoroscopy of the chest and stomach

Dose rate measurements were carried out at various distances behind the screen. Measurements were co...

Dose rate measurements were conducted at various distances behind the screen with different field si...

The effective dose to the eyes of radiologists during fluoroscopy of the chest and abdomen is primarily determined by scattered radiation behind the screen. Under normal working conditions, the dose to the eyes of radiologists is at the upper limit of the acceptable range. With typical fluoroscopy times of 15 hours per week, the dose of 0.1 r per week to the observer's eyes at 25 cm from the screen is only achieved under the most unfavorable conditions. The study shows that under normal working conditions, the dose to the eyes of radiologists is at the upper limit of the acceptable range.

Cite This Study
Macherauch E, Thelen PO (1959). Strahlenbelastung der Augen des Röntgenologen bei Thorax- und Magendurchleuchtungen.
Show BibTeX
@article{strahlenbelastung_der_augen_des_r_ntgenologen_bei_thorax_und_magendurchleuchtung_g6317,
  author = {Macherauch E and Thelen PO},
  title = {Strahlenbelastung der Augen des Röntgenologen bei Thorax- und Magendurchleuchtungen},
  year = {1959},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The study measured X-ray radiation doses to radiologists' eyes during chest and stomach fluoroscopy procedures. While specific dose levels aren't available from this early research, it documented occupational exposure that led to modern protective protocols.
Today's radiologists use lead aprons, protective eyewear, and digital imaging that requires far less radiation exposure. This 1959 research helped establish the safety protocols that dramatically reduced occupational radiation exposure in medical settings.
Scientists were beginning to understand radiation health risks and wanted to measure occupational exposure levels. Eyes are particularly sensitive to radiation damage, making them an important focus for protecting medical professionals who used fluoroscopy equipment daily.
Fluoroscopy uses X-ray radiation, which operates at much higher frequencies than radiofrequency EMF from phones or WiFi. X-rays are ionizing radiation capable of directly damaging DNA, unlike the non-ionizing RF radiation from wireless devices.
Early occupational exposure studies like this helped establish the principle that radiation exposure should be measured and minimized. This research contributed to developing protective equipment, exposure limits, and safety protocols still used in radiology today.