6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

Note: This study found no significant biological effects under its experimental conditions. We include all studies for scientific completeness.

Studies on the Biological Effect of High Frequency Radio Waves (Radar)

No Effects Found

Richard H. Follis, Jr. · 1946

Share:

Early 1946 radar study found no biological harm, establishing foundation for modern EMF health research.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1946 military study investigated whether radar equipment used during World War II caused biological harm to personnel, following widespread rumors of sterilization and hair loss. The research found no evidence that radar waves produced dangerous biological effects. This represents one of the earliest systematic investigations into high-frequency electromagnetic radiation health effects.

Why This Matters

This study holds unique historical significance as one of the first formal investigations into EMF health effects, prompted by military concerns during World War II. The reality is that radar operators were exposed to power levels far exceeding what we encounter from modern devices like cell phones and WiFi routers. What makes this research particularly relevant today is how it demonstrates a pattern we've seen repeatedly: new electromagnetic technologies generate health concerns that require scientific investigation. The science demonstrates that while this early study found no effects, it established the foundation for decades of EMF research that followed. Put simply, the concerns raised by radar operators in the 1940s mirror many of the questions we're asking about wireless technology today.

Cite This Study
Richard H. Follis, Jr. (1946). Studies on the Biological Effect of High Frequency Radio Waves (Radar).
Show BibTeX
@article{studies_on_the_biological_effect_of_high_frequency_radio_waves_radar__g3956,
  author = {Richard H. Follis and Jr.},
  title = {Studies on the Biological Effect of High Frequency Radio Waves (Radar)},
  year = {1946},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

No, the 1946 military study found no evidence that radar exposure caused sterilization or other reproductive harm among personnel, despite widespread rumors during wartime operations.
The study investigated rumors of alopecia (hair loss) among radar personnel but found no evidence linking radar wave exposure to hair loss or other biological effects.
World War II radar equipment operated at much higher power levels than today's consumer electronics, making this study relevant for understanding high-intensity electromagnetic exposure effects.
Researchers were concerned that unshielded X-rays might be emanating from radar apparatus, prompting investigation into both electromagnetic waves and potential ionizing radiation exposure.
Yes, researchers noted this portion of the electromagnetic spectrum had not been explored biologically before, making it a pioneering investigation into high-frequency radiation health effects.