STUDY OF POWER DENSITY MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Not an original health-effects study
Ernest Jacobs, Nabil Farhat, Robert A. Leavenworth, Kamal Yalloub · 1961
Finding
The theoretical analysis of the folded dipole antenna indicated that for 100-1 frequency bandwidth the total antenna length must be very small (<3 cm) thus presenting serious fabrication problems.
In their words
“The theoretical analysis of the folded dipole antenna indicated that for 100-1 frequency bandwidth the total antenna length must be very small (<3 cm) thus presenting serious fabrication problems.”
Exposure Details
- Power Density
- 1000 mw/cm²
Exposure Context
This study used 1000 mw/cm² for radio frequency:
- 100,000Mx above the Building Biology guideline of 0.1 μW/m²
- 1,666.7Mx above the BioInitiative Report recommendation of 0.0006 μW/cm²
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Cite This Study
Ernest Jacobs, Nabil Farhat, Robert A. Leavenworth, Kamal Yalloub (1961). STUDY OF POWER DENSITY MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES.
Show BibTeX
@article{study_of_power_density_measurement_techniques_g4773,
author = {Ernest Jacobs and Nabil Farhat and Robert A. Leavenworth and Kamal Yalloub},
title = {STUDY OF POWER DENSITY MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES},
year = {1961},
}No DOI on file for this study.