6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

STUDY OF POWER DENSITY MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES

Not an original health-effects study

Ernest Jacobs, Nabil Farhat, Robert A. Leavenworth, Kamal Yalloub · 1961

Share:

Finding

The theoretical analysis of the folded dipole antenna indicated that for 100-1 frequency bandwidth the total antenna length must be very small (<3 cm) thus presenting serious fabrication problems.

In their words

“The theoretical analysis of the folded dipole antenna indicated that for 100-1 frequency bandwidth the total antenna length must be very small (<3 cm) thus presenting serious fabrication problems.”

Exposure Details

Power Density
1000 mw/cm²

Exposure Context

This study used 1000 mw/cm² for radio frequency:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 1000 mw/cm²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)This level is 1,000 times the FCC limit
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 200 MHz to 10 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 200 MHz to 10 GHzPower lines50/60 HzCell phones~1 GHzWiFi2.4 GHz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale
Cite This Study
Ernest Jacobs, Nabil Farhat, Robert A. Leavenworth, Kamal Yalloub (1961). STUDY OF POWER DENSITY MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES.
Show BibTeX
@article{study_of_power_density_measurement_techniques_g4773,
  author = {Ernest Jacobs and Nabil Farhat and Robert A. Leavenworth and Kamal Yalloub},
  title = {STUDY OF POWER DENSITY MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES},
  year = {1961},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.