SUMMARIES - 1976 IMPI Symposium - Leuven, Belgium
Bioeffects Seen
Multiple authors including Prof. E. Grant, Dr. S. Michaelson, A. W. Guy, C. Harris, P. O. Kramer, A. F. Emery · 1976
Finding
No significant differences have been found between experimental and control animals. Aside from normal aging changes found in the lenses of the eight animals, no differences were noted in the eyes of the two groups.
In their words
“No significant differences have been found between experimental and control animals. Aside from normal aging changes found in the lenses of the eight animals, no differences were noted in the eyes of the two groups.”
Figures from the Original Paper
Diagram extracted from the original research document.
Exposure Details
- SAR
- 14 W/kg
- Power Density
- 10 mW/cm²
- Exposure Duration
- 23 hours/day for 6 months
Exposure Context
This study used 10 mW/cm² for radio frequency:
- 1,000Mx above the Building Biology guideline of 0.1 μW/m²
- 16.7Mx above the BioInitiative Report recommendation of 0.0006 μW/cm²
This study used 14 W/kg for SAR (device absorption):
- 35x above the Building Biology guideline of 0.4 W/kg
Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.
Where This Falls on the Concern Scale
Cite This Study
Multiple authors including Prof. E. Grant, Dr. S. Michaelson, A. W. Guy, C. Harris, P. O. Kramer, A. F. Emery (1976). SUMMARIES - 1976 IMPI Symposium - Leuven, Belgium.
Show BibTeX
@article{summaries_1976_impi_symposium_leuven_belgium_g3862,
author = {Multiple authors including Prof. E. Grant and Dr. S. Michaelson and A. W. Guy and C. Harris and P. O. Kramer and A. F. Emery},
title = {SUMMARIES - 1976 IMPI Symposium - Leuven, Belgium},
year = {1976},
}No DOI on file for this study.