8,655 Studies Reviewed. 86.9% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / GeneralPart of the Glaser Archive

The Distribution of Radiofrequency Current and Burns

Bioeffects Seen

Clair M. Becker, Inder V. Malhotra, John Hedley-Whyte · 1973

Share:

Radiofrequency current as low as 100 milliamperes per square centimeter can cause skin burns in just 10 seconds.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 1973 study documented nine patients who suffered burns at electrocardiogram electrode sites during electrosurgery procedures. Researchers found that radiofrequency current from surgical equipment was flowing through ECG monitoring cables, with currents reaching up to 290 milliamperes - enough to cause skin damage at approximately 100 milliamperes per square centimeter.

Why This Matters

This early medical case study reveals how radiofrequency energy can cause direct tissue damage when current pathways concentrate electrical flow through small contact points. The finding that 100 milliamperes per square centimeter for just 10 seconds can cause skin burns demonstrates the biological reality of EMF thermal effects. What makes this particularly relevant today is that modern wireless devices operate on similar radiofrequency principles, though at much lower power levels. The study's documentation of capacitive coupling in cables - where RF energy transfers without direct electrical connection - mirrors concerns about how wireless signals can interact with medical devices and body-worn electronics. While surgical electrocautery operates at much higher power levels than consumer devices, this research establishes clear biological thresholds for RF-induced tissue damage and highlights how equipment design flaws can create unexpected exposure pathways.

Figures from the Original Paper

Diagrams extracted from the original research document.

diagramPage 4 - AI-described figure: Schematic of CSV Bovie sentry module with labeled components and connections.
p. 4 of the original PDF
diagramPage 5 - Figure 2. Diagram of model used to simulate the electrical circuits present when the ground wire of the patient ground plate breaks.
p. 5 of the original PDF
diagramPage 6 - Figure 3. Diagram of circuits used to test for radiofrequency current division in anesthetized dogs undergoing electrosurgery.
p. 6 of the original PDF
diagramPage 7 - AI-described figure: Figure 4. System used to measure radiofrequency (RF) power and leakage to ground from electro-surgical units at each control setting.
p. 7 of the original PDF
diagramPage 10 - AI-described figure: Recordings from Tektronix 564 oscilloscope and camera system showing voltage and current waveforms in a sentry module of an electro-surgery unit, as depicted in Figure 5.
p. 10 of the original PDF

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Clair M. Becker, Inder V. Malhotra, John Hedley-Whyte (1973). The Distribution of Radiofrequency Current and Burns.
Show BibTeX
@article{the_distribution_of_radiofrequency_current_and_burns_g6808,
  author = {Clair M. Becker and Inder V. Malhotra and John Hedley-Whyte},
  title = {The Distribution of Radiofrequency Current and Burns},
  year = {1973},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.

Quick Questions About This Study

The study found that approximately 100 milliamperes per square centimeter for about 10 seconds can cause skin damage. Maximum currents measured in ECG electrodes ranged from 20 to 290 milliamperes during electrosurgery procedures.
Six causes were identified: broken ground wires, defective rectifiers, equipment compatibility issues, improper electrode use, capacitive coupling in ECG cables, and radiofrequency current division through the monitoring system.
Yes, dramatically. Current through an ECG electrode was ten times greater when placed on the upper arm versus the calf during chest surgery, even with the same ground plate placement under the patient.
Capacitive coupling occurs when radiofrequency energy transfers into ECG cables without direct electrical connection, allowing surgical current to flow through monitoring electrodes and potentially cause burns at contact sites.
The researchers suggested that radiofrequency inductors (chokes) may prevent these burns by blocking RF current flow through ECG monitoring cables while allowing normal cardiac signals to pass through for monitoring.