6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Whole Body / General1,009 citations

The Effects of Mobile Phone Radiofrequency Radiation on Cochlear Stria Marginal Cells in Sprague-Dawley Rats

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 2020

Share:

Mobile phone RFR did not cause DNA damage or apoptosis in marginal cells, but increased ROS production at 4 W/kg.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

The study applied 1,800 MHz mobile phone RFR at 2 and 4 W/kg with a 5-minute on, 10-minute off cycle for 24 hours. They measured DNA damage, apoptosis, and reactive oxygen species in marginal cells using Comet assay, flow cytometry, DAPI staining, and a fluorescent probe. No DNA damage or increase in apoptosis was observed, but ROS production was significantly higher in the 4 W/kg group compared with controls.

Why This Matters

The authors concluded that mobile phone energy was insufficient to cause DNA damage or apoptosis after short-term exposure, but that cumulative effects still need further confirmation. They also stated that activation of the ROS system plays a significant role in the biological effects of RFR.

Cite This Study
Unknown (2020). The Effects of Mobile Phone Radiofrequency Radiation on Cochlear Stria Marginal Cells in Sprague-Dawley Rats.
Show BibTeX
@article{the_effects_of_mobile_phone_radiofrequency_radiation_on_cochlear_stria_marginal_cells_in_sprague_dawley_rats_ce2652,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {The Effects of Mobile Phone Radiofrequency Radiation on Cochlear Stria Marginal Cells in Sprague-Dawley Rats},
  year = {2020},
  
  
}

Quick Questions About This Study

The study used 1,800 MHz mobile phone RFR at 2 and 4 W/kg with a 5-minute on, 10-minute off cycle for 24 hours.
DNA damage was assessed with the Comet assay, apoptosis with flow cytometry and DAPI staining, and ROS with a fluorescent probe.
The study found no DNA damage and no increase in apoptosis in marginal cells.
ROS production was significantly higher in the 4 W/kg exposure group than in controls.
They concluded that cumulative effects of mobile phone radiation require further confirmation. They also stated that activation of the ROS system plays a significant role in the biological effects of RFR.