8,700 Studies Reviewed. 87.0% Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.
Shield Your Body
Whole Body / General

The European Union assessments of radiofrequency radiation health risks – another hard nut to crack (Review)

Bioeffects Seen

Nyberg et al · 2023

Share:

Despite seven scientific appeals since 2017, the EU ignores mounting evidence of 5G health risks, prioritizing industry over public safety.

Plain English Summary

Summary written for general audiences

This 2023 review examined how the European Union has responded to scientific appeals about radiofrequency radiation health risks from wireless technology and 5G. The researchers found that despite seven formal appeals from scientists and doctors since 2017, the EU continues to ignore mounting evidence of health risks, following the same pattern as the WHO's dismissive approach to wireless radiation concerns.

Why This Matters

This review exposes a troubling pattern that extends far beyond scientific disagreement. When hundreds of independent scientists formally petition regulatory bodies about public health risks, and those petitions are systematically ignored, we're witnessing regulatory capture in real time. The science demonstrates clear biological effects from radiofrequency radiation, yet both the WHO and EU continue to prioritize industry interests over public health. What makes this particularly concerning is the documented conflicts of interest among key advisors to these organizations. The reality is that citizens are being subjected to an unprecedented experiment with 5G millimeter wave technology without their informed consent. You don't have to accept this situation as inevitable. The evidence shows that independent scientists worldwide are raising serious concerns, while industry-influenced regulatory bodies dismiss them without proper scientific consideration.

Exposure Information

Specific exposure levels were not quantified in this study.

Cite This Study
Nyberg et al (2023). The European Union assessments of radiofrequency radiation health risks – another hard nut to crack (Review).
Show BibTeX
@article{the_european_union_assessments_of_radiofrequency_radiation_health_risks_another_hard_nut_to_crack_review_ce4706,
  author = {Nyberg et al},
  title = {The European Union assessments of radiofrequency radiation health risks – another hard nut to crack (Review)},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.1515/reveh-2023-0046},
  
}
DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2023-0046PubMed: 37609829

Quick Questions About This Study

Seven formal appeals from scientists and medical doctors have been sent to the EU since September 2017, all requesting a halt to 5G rollout due to health concerns. All have been ignored despite mounting scientific evidence of harm.
5G uses millimeter waves and complex waveforms that represent a massive addition to existing electromagnetic pollution. These frequencies are fundamentally different from previous wireless technologies and contribute significantly more harmful radiation to our environment.
Many experts advising the WHO and EU have documented conflicts of interest due to their financial ties to the telecommunications industry. This creates a bias toward prioritizing economic interests over public health protection.
Yes, fundamental rights and EU primary law mandate that the European Union must protect its population, especially children, from all harmful health effects of wireless technology. However, these legal obligations are not being fulfilled.
The EU is following the same dismissive pattern established by the WHO, ignoring scientific evidence and appeals about wireless radiation health risks. This represents regulatory bodies prioritizing industry interests over independent scientific concerns.