6,486 Studies Reviewed. 85.2% of Original Studies Found Biological Effects. The Evidence is Clear.

The Journal of Microwave Power Volume 10, No. 1, March 1975

Bioeffects Seen

Authors not listed · 1975

Share:

Finding

No significant difference in any of the 3 indices between the CW and pulsed responses could be detected.

In their words

“No significant difference in any of the 3 indices between the CW and pulsed responses could be detected.”

Exposure Details

Power Density
80 mW/cm²

Exposure Context

This study used 80 mW/cm² for radio frequency:

Building Biology guidelines are practitioner-based limits from real-world assessments. BioInitiative Report recommendations are based on peer-reviewed science. Check Your Exposure to compare your own measurements.

Where This Falls on the Concern Scale

Study Exposure Level in ContextStudy Exposure Level in ContextThis study: 80 mW/cm²Extreme Concern - 1,000 µW/m²FCC Limit - 10M µW/m²Effects observed in the Extreme Concern range (Building Biology)This level is 80 times the FCC limit
A logarithmic frequency spectrum from 10 Hz to 100 GHz showing where this study's 2.4 GHz exposure sits relative to common EMF sources.Where This Frequency Sits on the EMF SpectrumELFVLFLF / MFHF / VHFUHFSHFmm10 Hz100 GHzThis study: 2.4 GHzPower lines50/60 Hz5G mm28 GHzLogarithmic scale
Cite This Study
Unknown (1975). The Journal of Microwave Power Volume 10, No. 1, March 1975.
Show BibTeX
@article{the_journal_of_microwave_power_volume_10_no_1_march_1975_g6536,
  author = {Unknown},
  title = {The Journal of Microwave Power Volume 10, No. 1, March 1975},
  year = {1975},
  
  
}
No DOI on file for this study.